< One-sided tape: buyersAPTUSDT · historical base rate

One-sided tape: buyers on APTUSDT

Taker buy ratio over the last 15 minutes has run at 0.62 or more: a persistently buyer-heavy tape.

What has happened on APTUSDT when it held

Historically, when One-sided tape: buyers on APTUSDT held (393 occurrences in the scanned window, 383 with a computable 24h horizon), the market reached +5% within 24h in 37 of 383 (9.7) and drew down 10%+ in 0 of 383 (0.0). Maximum favorable (MFE) and maximum adverse (MAE) excursions, both computed forward.

Outcome distribution

WHAT FOLLOWED - ALL 393 MATCHES, FROM THE PER-SCAN SUMMARY

0 OF 392 (0.0%) REACHED +5% WITHIN 1H

METRIC MFE_1H · CHIPS RE-READ THE SUMMARY, NEVER RE-QUERY

🔒 COMPUTED FORWARD, NEVER A FILTER · DENOMINATOR 392 = MATCHES WITH A COMPLETE 1H HORIZON (1 ABSENT: TOO CLOSE TO THE RECORD EDGE FOR 1H - NEVER TRUNCATED, NEVER AN IMPLIED ZERO)

OCCURRENCES PER DAY · UTC · SUM 393 - ALL 393, NOT THE PAGE
MAX 19 · 2026-07-0107-0607-1307-2007-272026-07-01 TO 2026-07-31 · 31 UTC DAYS · ZERO DAYS KEEP THEIR SLOT

About 13 a day, on 29 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

FWD_RET_30M DISTRIBUTION · 392 PRESENT · 1 ABSENT
≥ +5: 0 OF 392000017165214410000≤-20-20..-15-15..-10-10..-5-5..-2-2..-1-1..00..+1+1..+2+2..+5+5..+10+10..+15+15..+20≥+20

Forward 30-minute returns across 392 matches: 56% of them finished up.

Upside reached (MFE, 24h)Drawdown (MAE, 24h)

Versus baseline

Historically, when any eligible APTUSDT minute in the window (baseline) held (36,291 occurrences in the scanned window, 34,971 with a computable 24h horizon), the market reached +5% within 24h in 3,181 of 34,971 (9.1) and drew down 10%+ in 0 of 34,971 (0.0). Maximum favorable (MFE) and maximum adverse (MAE) excursions, both computed forward.

The full record

The same setup counted over every recorded day on APTUSDT (2026-05-15 to 2026-07-31), growing daily.

Historically, when One-sided tape: buyers on APTUSDT over the full record held (710 occurrences in the scanned window, 700 with a computable 24h horizon), the market reached +5% within 24h in 80 of 700 (11.4) and drew down 10%+ in 10 of 700 (1.4). Maximum favorable (MFE) and maximum adverse (MAE) excursions, both computed forward.

WHAT FOLLOWED - ALL 710 MATCHES, FROM THE PER-SCAN SUMMARY

0 OF 709 (0.0%) REACHED +5% WITHIN 1H

METRIC MFE_1H · CHIPS RE-READ THE SUMMARY, NEVER RE-QUERY

🔒 COMPUTED FORWARD, NEVER A FILTER · DENOMINATOR 709 = MATCHES WITH A COMPLETE 1H HORIZON (1 ABSENT: TOO CLOSE TO THE RECORD EDGE FOR 1H - NEVER TRUNCATED, NEVER AN IMPLIED ZERO)

OCCURRENCES PER DAY · UTC · SUM 710 - ALL 710, NOT THE PAGE
MAX 18 · 2026-07-01MAY 15JUN 01JUL 012026-05-15 TO 2026-07-31 · 78 UTC DAYS · ZERO DAYS KEEP THEIR SLOT

About 9.1 a day, on 55 of 78 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

FWD_RET_30M DISTRIBUTION · 709 PRESENT · 1 ABSENT
≥ +5: 0 OF 70900007193153461930000≤-20-20..-15-15..-10-10..-5-5..-2-2..-1-1..00..+1+1..+2+2..+5+5..+10+10..+15+15..+20≥+20

Forward 30-minute returns across 709 matches: close to an even split, which is what a coin flip looks like.

Reproducibility key (q#fb5d728c)
grammar
research_query.v2
normalization
archive_normalization.v1
feature library
feature_defs.v1
dataset revision
52a43a418a97fbe3a324f7c372fa4d53967163acaa0ed33c56b78ddd897331a4
query hash
fb5d728ce4ed10686369872b82e72fda5d7b0d703797b60ca80954b69a981054
scanned window
2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z to 2026-07-31T00:00:00.000Z (UTC)

Same key, same bytes. This receipt reruns; it does not retell. When the record grows, the dataset revision changes and says so.

Re-run this over the API or MCP

This is the exact research_query.v2 definition behind the receipt. Send it to the key-authed research API (or the MCP research tool) and diff the bytes: a cached rerun is free.

{
  "schema_version": "research_query.v2",
  "normalization_version": "archive_normalization.v1",
  "feature_version": "feature_defs.v1",
  "target": "record_occurrences",
  "where": {
    "all": [
      [
        "feature.taker_buy_ratio_15m",
        "gte",
        0.62
      ],
      [
        "identity.symbol",
        "eq",
        "aptusdt"
      ],
      [
        "times.anchor_time",
        "between",
        [
          "2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z",
          "2026-07-31T00:00:00.000Z"
        ]
      ]
    ]
  },
  "sort": [
    "times.anchor_time",
    "desc"
  ],
  "page": {
    "limit": 50,
    "cursor": null
  }
}
curl -s https://app.edgedepth.com/api/v1/research/query \
  -H 'authorization: Bearer $EDGEDEPTH_API_KEY' \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  -d '{"schema_version":"research_query.v2","normalization_version":"archive_normalization.v1","feature_version":"feature_defs.v1","target":"record_occurrences","where":{"all":[["feature.taker_buy_ratio_15m","gte",0.62],["identity.symbol","eq","aptusdt"],["times.anchor_time","between",["2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z","2026-07-31T00:00:00.000Z"]]]},"sort":["times.anchor_time","desc"],"page":{"limit":50,"cursor":null}}'

How to read this

  • Counts ship with denominators: occurrences across the eligible symbol-buckets scanned. A rate is over the occurrences with a computable horizon (present), never the total.
  • Absent is absent. When a feature was not warm at a minute, that bucket leaves the denominator and is reported; it is never coerced to zero.
  • This selects a setup, never its outcome. The grammar forbids filtering on what followed (OUTCOME_IN_PREDICATE), so the distribution below is over every occurrence, not a survivorship-picked subset.

Occurrences are observed examples in a selected archive, not a guarantee. Outcomes are computed forward from each anchor and are descriptive, never a filter and never a prediction. Nothing here is trading advice.

Everything measured on APTUSDT right now: the APTUSDT research page