Price touched +5% or higher
- When this held
- 67.2% · 158 of 235 minutes
- Other minutes
- 75.0% · 28,841 of 38,431 minutes
One-sided tape: buyers on BTRUSDT
Taker buy ratio over the last 15 minutes has run at 0.62 or more: a persistently buyer-heavy tape.
Read it in context
Read BTRUSDT itself
Its recorded moves
Test it on BTRUSDT, then plan it
A tested result leads to Plan a trade, which measures what trading it would have paid after costs.
What happened in the next 24 hours?
Reaching +5% was about as common as without it; falling to −10% was less common than without it.
Other minutes are the same markets and dates without this condition. Each percentage is the share of measured minutes that reached that move from the starting price.
Price touched −10% or lower
- When this held
- 17.4% · 41 of 235 minutes
- Other minutes
- 31.3% · 12,025 of 38,431 minutes
Price can touch both levels within the same 24 hours.
This counts how often price touched a level, not what trading it would have paid.
Sample and counting
Rates use the 235 of 243 matches with a full 24 hours after them. The 8 newer ones are left out, not counted as zero.
Every condition is measured over the same 24 hours, whatever the length of its own reading. Other windows and move sizes shows shorter and longer windows.
When it happened
About 7.8 a day, on 29 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.
Other windows and move sizes
| Move | 1 hour | 4 hours | 24 hours | 72 hours | 7 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured | 242 | 241 | 235 | 219 | 211 |
| Too recent | 1 | 2 | 8 | 24 | 32 |
| +0.1% or more | 221 (91.3%) | 231 (95.9%) | 233 (99.1%) | 219 (100.0%) | 211 (100.0%) |
| +0.2% or more | 203 (83.9%) | 222 (92.1%) | 231 (98.3%) | 218 (99.5%) | 211 (100.0%) |
| +0.5% or more | 163 (67.4%) | 209 (86.7%) | 229 (97.4%) | 218 (99.5%) | 211 (100.0%) |
| +1% or more | 114 (47.1%) | 182 (75.5%) | 219 (93.2%) | 218 (99.5%) | 211 (100.0%) |
| +2% or more | 48 (19.8%) | 120 (49.8%) | 205 (87.2%) | 215 (98.2%) | 211 (100.0%) |
| +5% or more | 8 (3.3%) | 44 (18.3%) | 158 (67.2%) | 200 (91.3%) | 209 (99.1%) |
| +10% or more | 4 (1.7%) | 15 (6.2%) | 76 (32.3%) | 116 (53.0%) | 169 (80.1%) |
| +15% or more | 3 (1.2%) | 10 (4.1%) | 49 (20.9%) | 94 (42.9%) | 150 (71.1%) |
| +20% or more | 1 (0.4%) | 7 (2.9%) | 44 (18.7%) | 93 (42.5%) | 146 (69.2%) |
| +30% or more | 1 (0.4%) | 5 (2.1%) | 28 (11.9%) | 68 (31.1%) | 118 (55.9%) |
| +50% or more | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (1.7%) | 25 (10.6%) | 52 (23.7%) | 107 (50.7%) |
| +100% or more | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.4%) | 12 (5.1%) | 32 (14.6%) | 86 (40.8%) |
| +200% or more | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 10 (4.3%) | 30 (13.7%) | 82 (38.9%) |
| +400% or more | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 25 (11.4%) | 76 (36.0%) |
| −0.1% or lower | 232 (95.9%) | 236 (97.9%) | 234 (99.6%) | 218 (99.5%) | 210 (99.5%) |
| −0.2% or lower | 219 (90.5%) | 230 (95.4%) | 233 (99.1%) | 218 (99.5%) | 210 (99.5%) |
| −0.5% or lower | 174 (71.9%) | 206 (85.5%) | 226 (96.2%) | 213 (97.3%) | 205 (97.2%) |
| −1% or lower | 110 (45.5%) | 171 (71.0%) | 211 (89.8%) | 201 (91.8%) | 194 (91.9%) |
| −2% or lower | 53 (21.9%) | 118 (49.0%) | 196 (83.4%) | 193 (88.1%) | 186 (88.2%) |
| −5% or lower | 7 (2.9%) | 34 (14.1%) | 144 (61.3%) | 162 (74.0%) | 166 (78.7%) |
| −10% or lower | 2 (0.8%) | 12 (5.0%) | 41 (17.4%) | 73 (33.3%) | 120 (56.9%) |
| −15% or lower | 1 (0.4%) | 5 (2.1%) | 28 (11.9%) | 62 (28.3%) | 114 (54.0%) |
| −20% or lower | 1 (0.4%) | 3 (1.2%) | 22 (9.4%) | 56 (25.6%) | 110 (52.1%) |
| −30% or lower | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (1.7%) | 9 (4.1%) | 8 (3.8%) |
| −50% or lower | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (1.3%) | 8 (3.7%) | 7 (3.3%) |
Each window counts only matches old enough for it, so a longer window can show fewer.
Distributions and daily counts
Upside reached · 24hThe most price moved up within 24 hours of each match: a high-water mark, never a close. 235 with a complete 24 hours.
Drawdown · 24hThe worst price moved against within 24 hours of each match: the deepest point, never the close. 235 with a complete 24 hours.
Price 30 minutes laterForward 30-minute returns across 242 matches: close to an even split, which is what a coin flip looks like. 1 too recent.
Matches per UTC day
- 9 Aug13 matches
- 10 Aug12 matches
- 11 Aug3 matches
- 12 Aug5 matches
- 13 Aug14 matches
- 14 Aug14 matches
- 15 Aug13 matches
- 16 Aug15 matches
- 17 Aug12 matches
- 18 Aug15 matches
- 19 Aug14 matches
- 20 Aug16 matches
- 21 Aug14 matches
- 22 Aug13 matches
- 23 Aug10 matches
- 24 Aug9 matches
- 25 Aug11 matches
- 26 Aug1 match
- 27 Aug0 matches
- 28 Aug1 match
- 29 Aug2 matches
- 30 Aug1 match
- 31 Aug3 matches
- 1 Sep2 matches
- 2 Sep1 match
- 3 Sep2 matches
- 4 Sep3 matches
- 5 Sep6 matches
- 6 Sep10 matches
- 7 Sep8 matches
- 8 Sep0 matches
How this is counted
- Each rate counts only matches with the full window after them.
- A minute where a reading was missing is left out and reported, not read as zero.
- The condition picks the setup, never the outcome: a definition that filters on what followed is rejected (OUTCOME_IN_PREDICATE). Every match is measured, winners and losers alike.
- "Other minutes" is every other eligible minute in the same market and window. It is a reference, not a control group.
- "Reached +5%" uses the highest price inside the window (maximum favourable excursion, MFE); "fell to −10%" uses the lowest (maximum adverse excursion, MAE). Neither is the close.
- Checked 43,201 eligible market-minutes (eligible_symbol_buckets) on BTRUSDT, 2026-08-09 00:00 to 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC.
Reproducibility key (q#fa0d2658)
The key that re-runs this exact count. Same key, same bytes; when the record grows, the dataset revision changes.
- grammar
- research_query.v2
- normalization
- archive_normalization.v1
- feature library
- feature_defs.v1
- dataset revision
- cbaead34c4193bce6fcd165b579f45236bd1961521f84932d458473d0a2bae69
- query hash
- fa0d2658f6d501169996a13a2c2b7058f60b35ce5fd283d1c1a3be6cd61ddf50
- scanned window
- 2026-08-09T00:00:00.000Z to 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z (UTC)
Re-run over the API
The exact search definition behind this count. Send it to the key-authed research API (or the MCP research tool) and compare the bytes; a cached rerun is free.
{
"schema_version": "research_query.v2",
"normalization_version": "archive_normalization.v1",
"feature_version": "feature_defs.v1",
"target": "record_occurrences",
"where": {
"all": [
[
"feature.taker_buy_ratio_15m",
"gte",
0.62
],
[
"identity.symbol",
"eq",
"btrusdt"
],
[
"times.anchor_time",
"between",
[
"2026-08-09T00:00:00.000Z",
"2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z"
]
]
]
},
"sort": [
"times.anchor_time",
"desc"
],
"page": {
"limit": 50,
"cursor": null
}
}curl -s https://app.edgedepth.com/api/v1/research/query \
-H 'authorization: Bearer $EDGEDEPTH_API_KEY' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
-d '{"schema_version":"research_query.v2","normalization_version":"archive_normalization.v1","feature_version":"feature_defs.v1","target":"record_occurrences","where":{"all":[["feature.taker_buy_ratio_15m","gte",0.62],["identity.symbol","eq","btrusdt"],["times.anchor_time","between",["2026-08-09T00:00:00.000Z","2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z"]]]},"sort":["times.anchor_time","desc"],"page":{"limit":50,"cursor":null}}'