SKYAIUSDT · recorded history

One-sided tape: buyers on SKYAIUSDT

Taker buy ratio over the last 15 minutes has run at 0.62 or more: a persistently buyer-heavy tape.

Read it in context

  1. Read SKYAIUSDT itself

  2. Its recorded moves

  3. Test it on SKYAIUSDT, then plan it

    A tested result leads to Plan a trade, which measures what trading it would have paid after costs.

What happened in the next 24 hours?

Both moves were less common than on minutes without it.

Other minutes are the same markets and dates without this condition. Each percentage is the share of measured minutes that reached that move from the starting price.

Price touched +5% or higher

When this held
42.6% · 103 of 242 minutes
Other minutes
58.0% · 18,897 of 32,577 minutes

Price touched −10% or lower

When this held
8.7% · 21 of 242 minutes
Other minutes
14.9% · 4,862 of 32,577 minutes

Price can touch both levels within the same 24 hours.

This counts how often price touched a level, not what trading it would have paid.

Sample and counting

Rates use the 242 of 243 matches with a full 24 hours after them. The 1 newer ones are left out, not counted as zero.

Every condition is measured over the same 24 hours, whatever the length of its own reading. Other windows and move sizes shows shorter and longer windows.

When it happened
Matches per UTC day, 2026-07-14 to 2026-08-13

About 7.8 a day, on 22 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

Over the full record

Every recorded day on SKYAIUSDT, 2026-05-15 to 2026-08-13: reached +5% in 238 of 487 (48.9%); fell to −10% in 140 of 487 (28.7%), within 24 hours.

Other windows and move sizes
Matches that reached each move within each window. Counts first; the measured row is what each rate is over.
Move1 hour4 hours24 hours
Measured243242242
Too recent011
+1% or more98 (40.3%)168 (69.4%)218 (90.1%)
+2% or more41 (16.9%)115 (47.5%)181 (74.8%)
+5% or more3 (1.2%)24 (9.9%)103 (42.6%)
+10% or more0 (0.0%)5 (2.1%)45 (18.6%)
+15% or more0 (0.0%)1 (0.4%)24 (9.9%)
+20% or more0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)19 (7.9%)
−1% or lower89 (36.6%)163 (67.4%)208 (86.0%)
−2% or lower18 (7.4%)86 (35.5%)170 (70.2%)
−5% or lower0 (0.0%)8 (3.3%)81 (33.5%)
−10% or lower0 (0.0%)2 (0.8%)21 (8.7%)
−15% or lower0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)12 (5.0%)
−20% or lower0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)4 (1.7%)

Each window counts only matches old enough for it, so a longer window can show fewer.

Full record: other windows and move sizes
Matches that reached each move within each window. Counts first; the measured row is what each rate is over.
Move1 hour4 hours24 hours
Measured488487487
Too recent122
+1% or more238 (48.8%)357 (73.3%)445 (91.4%)
+2% or more113 (23.2%)253 (52.0%)381 (78.2%)
+5% or more16 (3.3%)82 (16.8%)238 (48.9%)
+10% or more2 (0.4%)17 (3.5%)116 (23.8%)
+15% or more1 (0.2%)5 (1.0%)67 (13.8%)
+20% or more1 (0.2%)4 (0.8%)50 (10.3%)
−1% or lower238 (48.8%)372 (76.4%)445 (91.4%)
−2% or lower101 (20.7%)249 (51.1%)390 (80.1%)
−5% or lower18 (3.7%)85 (17.5%)271 (55.6%)
−10% or lower4 (0.8%)25 (5.1%)140 (28.7%)
−15% or lower0 (0.0%)7 (1.4%)95 (19.5%)
−20% or lower0 (0.0%)5 (1.0%)64 (13.1%)

Each window counts only matches old enough for it, so a longer window can show fewer.

Distributions and daily counts
Upside reached · 24hUpside reached (MFE, 24h)The most price moved up within 24 hours of each match: a high-water mark, never a close. 242 with a complete 24 hours.
Drawdown · 24hDrawdown (MAE, 24h)The worst price moved against within 24 hours of each match: the deepest point, never the close. 242 with a complete 24 hours.
Price 30 minutes laterForward 30-minute returnForward 30-minute returns across 243 matches: close to an even split, which is what a coin flip looks like. 0 too recent.

How to read a distribution

Matches per UTC day

  • 14 Jul14 matches
  • 15 Jul7 matches
  • 16 Jul7 matches
  • 17 Jul5 matches
  • 18 Jul14 matches
  • 19 Jul11 matches
  • 20 Jul8 matches
  • 21 Jul16 matches
  • 22 Jul11 matches
  • 23 Jul12 matches
  • 24 Jul14 matches
  • 25 Jul14 matches
  • 26 Jul9 matches
  • 27 Jul13 matches
  • 28 Jul17 matches
  • 29 Jul15 matches
  • 30 Jul12 matches
  • 31 Jul18 matches
  • 1 Aug14 matches
  • 2 Aug9 matches
  • 3 Aug2 matches
  • 4 Aug0 matches
  • 5 Aug0 matches
  • 6 Aug0 matches
  • 7 Aug0 matches
  • 8 Aug1 match
  • 9 Aug0 matches
  • 10 Aug0 matches
  • 11 Aug0 matches
  • 12 Aug0 matches
  • 13 Aug0 matches
How this is counted
  • Each rate counts only matches with the full window after them.
  • A minute where a reading was missing is left out and reported, not read as zero.
  • The condition picks the setup, never the outcome: a definition that filters on what followed is rejected (OUTCOME_IN_PREDICATE). Every match is measured, winners and losers alike.
  • "Other minutes" is every other eligible minute in the same market and window. It is a reference, not a control group.
  • "Reached +5%" uses the highest price inside the window (maximum favourable excursion, MFE); "fell to −10%" uses the lowest (maximum adverse excursion, MAE). Neither is the close.
  • Checked 37,441 eligible market-minutes (eligible_symbol_buckets) on SKYAIUSDT, 2026-07-14 00:00 to 2026-08-13 00:00 UTC.

What are MFE and MAE?

Reproducibility key (q#1feab027)

The key that re-runs this exact count. Same key, same bytes; when the record grows, the dataset revision changes.

grammar
research_query.v2
normalization
archive_normalization.v1
feature library
feature_defs.v1
dataset revision
61bfec1f11b1a5446c9ed1d61d79e19aa54fcfe26ecebe03e8fa5a90013f3b17
query hash
1feab027c5415c2fc27ebb84b9fef16ec9b5d5bc19a0bcf03cd08cf941bd12fd
scanned window
2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z to 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z (UTC)

Re-run over the API

The exact search definition behind this count. Send it to the key-authed research API (or the MCP research tool) and compare the bytes; a cached rerun is free.

{
  "schema_version": "research_query.v2",
  "normalization_version": "archive_normalization.v1",
  "feature_version": "feature_defs.v1",
  "target": "record_occurrences",
  "where": {
    "all": [
      [
        "feature.taker_buy_ratio_15m",
        "gte",
        0.62
      ],
      [
        "identity.symbol",
        "eq",
        "skyaiusdt"
      ],
      [
        "times.anchor_time",
        "between",
        [
          "2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z",
          "2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z"
        ]
      ]
    ]
  },
  "sort": [
    "times.anchor_time",
    "desc"
  ],
  "page": {
    "limit": 50,
    "cursor": null
  }
}
curl -s https://app.edgedepth.com/api/v1/research/query \
  -H 'authorization: Bearer $EDGEDEPTH_API_KEY' \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  -d '{"schema_version":"research_query.v2","normalization_version":"archive_normalization.v1","feature_version":"feature_defs.v1","target":"record_occurrences","where":{"all":[["feature.taker_buy_ratio_15m","gte",0.62],["identity.symbol","eq","skyaiusdt"],["times.anchor_time","between",["2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z","2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z"]]]},"sort":["times.anchor_time","desc"],"page":{"limit":50,"cursor":null}}'

Past examples from the record, not a guarantee or a prediction. Nothing here is trading advice.