GWEIUSDT · recorded history

One-sided tape: sellers on GWEIUSDT

Taker buy ratio over the last 15 minutes has run at 0.38 or less: a persistently seller-heavy tape.

Read it in context

  1. Read GWEIUSDT itself

  2. Its recorded moves

  3. Test it on GWEIUSDT, then plan it

    A tested result leads to Plan a trade, which measures what trading it would have paid after costs.

What happened in the next 24 hours?

This condition showed no clear difference for either move.

Other minutes are the same markets and dates without this condition. Each percentage is the share of measured minutes that reached that move from the starting price.

Price touched +5% or higher

When this held
54.8% · 183 of 334 minutes
Other minutes
55.5% · 19,606 of 35,304 minutes

Price touched −10% or lower

When this held
38.6% · 129 of 334 minutes
Other minutes
44.4% · 15,689 of 35,304 minutes

Price can touch both levels within the same 24 hours.

This counts how often price touched a level, not what trading it would have paid.

Sample and counting

Rates use the 334 of 348 matches with a full 24 hours after them. The 14 newer ones are left out, not counted as zero.

Every condition is measured over the same 24 hours, whatever the length of its own reading. Other windows and move sizes shows shorter and longer windows.

When it happened
Matches per UTC day, 2026-07-15 to 2026-08-14

About 11 a day, on 28 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

Over the full record

Every recorded day on GWEIUSDT, 2026-05-15 to 2026-08-14: reached +5% in 456 of 778 (58.6%); fell to −10% in 299 of 778 (38.4%), within 24 hours.

Other windows and move sizes
Matches that reached each move within each window. Counts first; the measured row is what each rate is over.
Move1 hour4 hours24 hours
Measured348346334
Too recent0214
+1% or more193 (55.5%)272 (78.6%)300 (89.8%)
+2% or more108 (31.0%)220 (63.6%)269 (80.5%)
+5% or more14 (4.0%)77 (22.3%)183 (54.8%)
+10% or more0 (0.0%)10 (2.9%)87 (26.0%)
+15% or more0 (0.0%)5 (1.4%)54 (16.2%)
+20% or more0 (0.0%)2 (0.6%)36 (10.8%)
−1% or lower225 (64.7%)295 (85.3%)308 (92.2%)
−2% or lower105 (30.2%)217 (62.7%)270 (80.8%)
−5% or lower9 (2.6%)76 (22.0%)207 (62.0%)
−10% or lower0 (0.0%)4 (1.2%)129 (38.6%)
−15% or lower0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)56 (16.8%)
−20% or lower0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)10 (3.0%)

Each window counts only matches old enough for it, so a longer window can show fewer.

Full record: other windows and move sizes
Matches that reached each move within each window. Counts first; the measured row is what each rate is over.
Move1 hour4 hours24 hours
Measured792790778
Too recent0214
+1% or more425 (53.7%)618 (78.2%)706 (90.7%)
+2% or more232 (29.3%)477 (60.4%)638 (82.0%)
+5% or more33 (4.2%)173 (21.9%)456 (58.6%)
+10% or more1 (0.1%)36 (4.6%)234 (30.1%)
+15% or more1 (0.1%)14 (1.8%)169 (21.7%)
+20% or more1 (0.1%)6 (0.8%)118 (15.2%)
−1% or lower464 (58.6%)644 (81.5%)725 (93.2%)
−2% or lower224 (28.3%)457 (57.8%)634 (81.5%)
−5% or lower28 (3.5%)165 (20.9%)475 (61.1%)
−10% or lower2 (0.3%)21 (2.7%)299 (38.4%)
−15% or lower1 (0.1%)7 (0.9%)163 (21.0%)
−20% or lower0 (0.0%)3 (0.4%)62 (8.0%)

Each window counts only matches old enough for it, so a longer window can show fewer.

Distributions and daily counts
Upside reached · 24hUpside reached (MFE, 24h)The most price moved up within 24 hours of each match: a high-water mark, never a close. 334 with a complete 24 hours.
Drawdown · 24hDrawdown (MAE, 24h)The worst price moved against within 24 hours of each match: the deepest point, never the close. 334 with a complete 24 hours.
Price 30 minutes laterForward 30-minute returnForward 30-minute returns across 348 matches: close to an even split, which is what a coin flip looks like. 0 too recent.

How to read a distribution

Matches per UTC day

  • 15 Jul13 matches
  • 16 Jul16 matches
  • 17 Jul13 matches
  • 18 Jul16 matches
  • 19 Jul14 matches
  • 20 Jul14 matches
  • 21 Jul18 matches
  • 22 Jul14 matches
  • 23 Jul14 matches
  • 24 Jul10 matches
  • 25 Jul8 matches
  • 26 Jul13 matches
  • 27 Jul13 matches
  • 28 Jul11 matches
  • 29 Jul13 matches
  • 30 Jul12 matches
  • 31 Jul12 matches
  • 1 Aug13 matches
  • 2 Aug15 matches
  • 3 Aug13 matches
  • 4 Aug16 matches
  • 5 Aug14 matches
  • 6 Aug11 matches
  • 7 Aug0 matches
  • 8 Aug2 matches
  • 9 Aug9 matches
  • 10 Aug6 matches
  • 11 Aug11 matches
  • 12 Aug14 matches
  • 13 Aug0 matches
  • 14 Aug0 matches
How this is counted
  • Each rate counts only matches with the full window after them.
  • A minute where a reading was missing is left out and reported, not read as zero.
  • The condition picks the setup, never the outcome: a definition that filters on what followed is rejected (OUTCOME_IN_PREDICATE). Every match is measured, winners and losers alike.
  • "Other minutes" is every other eligible minute in the same market and window. It is a reference, not a control group.
  • "Reached +5%" uses the highest price inside the window (maximum favourable excursion, MFE); "fell to −10%" uses the lowest (maximum adverse excursion, MAE). Neither is the close.
  • Checked 41,761 eligible market-minutes (eligible_symbol_buckets) on GWEIUSDT, 2026-07-15 00:00 to 2026-08-14 00:00 UTC.

What are MFE and MAE?

Reproducibility key (q#2fecf165)

The key that re-runs this exact count. Same key, same bytes; when the record grows, the dataset revision changes.

grammar
research_query.v2
normalization
archive_normalization.v1
feature library
feature_defs.v1
dataset revision
3f9230e34c0a14e16a7bb3035842c9f073de8c4cb679de6f70e64bbb2153d03a
query hash
2fecf1653912c1d1e60a5c3de99956613b4aede963e1e52032af25314cdffc61
scanned window
2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z to 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z (UTC)

Re-run over the API

The exact search definition behind this count. Send it to the key-authed research API (or the MCP research tool) and compare the bytes; a cached rerun is free.

{
  "schema_version": "research_query.v2",
  "normalization_version": "archive_normalization.v1",
  "feature_version": "feature_defs.v1",
  "target": "record_occurrences",
  "where": {
    "all": [
      [
        "feature.taker_buy_ratio_15m",
        "lte",
        0.38
      ],
      [
        "identity.symbol",
        "eq",
        "gweiusdt"
      ],
      [
        "times.anchor_time",
        "between",
        [
          "2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z",
          "2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z"
        ]
      ]
    ]
  },
  "sort": [
    "times.anchor_time",
    "desc"
  ],
  "page": {
    "limit": 50,
    "cursor": null
  }
}
curl -s https://app.edgedepth.com/api/v1/research/query \
  -H 'authorization: Bearer $EDGEDEPTH_API_KEY' \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  -d '{"schema_version":"research_query.v2","normalization_version":"archive_normalization.v1","feature_version":"feature_defs.v1","target":"record_occurrences","where":{"all":[["feature.taker_buy_ratio_15m","lte",0.38],["identity.symbol","eq","gweiusdt"],["times.anchor_time","between",["2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z","2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z"]]]},"sort":["times.anchor_time","desc"],"page":{"limit":50,"cursor":null}}'

Past examples from the record, not a guarantee or a prediction. Nothing here is trading advice.