Research is a work in progress. Estimated release: 1 December 2026. Our goal is to make it a search engine for trading setups in recorded crypto markets.

BRBRUSDTBinance USDT-M
Saved 22 Sep 2026 · will not change

BRUSDT rose 576% on 16 September 2026

What happenedUp 576% from the 09:00 UTC open to the 10:00 high on 20 September.Chart
Before itAt 08:59, 10 of 87 readings stood out; 3 were tested together.Setup
The recordToo few results to compare.Result

Picked after the rise, on one market.

What happened

Readings1.4970.111816 Sep17 Sep18 Sep19 Sep20 SepHighest trade 1.40172 in the 10:00 UTC hour on 20 September

Price opened the 09:00 hour at 0.2073 and reached a highest trade of 1.402 in the 10:00 hour; the tested readings were taken at 08:59.

What stood out at 08:59

08:59 always meets its own rules.

What the record says

23 Aug to 21 Sep 2026

Too few results to compare

Price at least 2% higher after 30 minutes

This setup
4/16 measured outcomes · fewer than 30, so no rate is printed
Any BR minute, same dates
4,138/43,161 (9.6%)
0%10%

16 matches in 43,201 minutes checked.

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Evidence
At least 2% lower after 30 minutes
2% or more lower: 0 of 16; the other 12 closed less than 2% either way.
Direction only, any size, after 30 minutes
10 at or above the match price, 6 below; most of both were under 2% (12 of 16).
Reference
Every BR minute from 23 August to 21 September 2026 with a 30-minute close, the 16 matches included; not a matched control group. 40 minutes at the end of the dates had no 30-minute close yet and are left out, not counted as zero.
Did not reach the outcome
12 of 16 were not 2% or more higher.
Not a trading test
Entry, exit, fees, slippage and risk are not tested.

No test to open

Multiple recorded sectors: sector_crypto, sector_defi. Choose one explicitly.

Details
Exactly what was counted3 conditions · 16 of 43,201 minutes · saved text
  • Order book lopsidedness 0.053 or lower. How lopsided the sizes at the best bid and ask were, either way, against recent readings; low means unusually even.Book imbalance percentile ≤ 0.053 · feature.book_imbalance_pctrank
  • Book capture is native.Book capture native · feature.book_source
  • 4-hour range against usual 0.27 or lower. The last finished 4-hour candle's high to low range, as a multiple of its usual range.Compression · 4h ≤ 0.27 · feature.candle_compression_4h

Read at 1 minute before the move.

Read at 08:59 UTC on 16 September, one minute before the selected 09:00 start.

BR only, 23 August to 21 September 2026 (UTC, ending 22 September 00:00); all 3 readings had values on 43,201 of those minutes.

Reference: every BR minute over the same dates, matches included; it is not a matched control group.

Outcome: the close exactly 30 minutes later, not the highest or lowest price along the way.

The 09:00 start was picked automatically after the move.

BRUSDT stored readings end 2026-09-22 00:00 UTC (exclusive). Prices and tick replay have separate coverage.

The feature manifest spans the lead-up. Individual minutes or inputs can still be unavailable.

This is not a similarity search. Each count matches the exact readings above and nothing else.

Picked in hindsight: the counts include every other time these readings appeared, not just this move.

Fires often arrive as clusters of consecutive minutes, and forward windows overlap. A cluster is one episode, not many independent trials.

If these counts read weaker than the move suggested, that is the tool working: the lead-up of a picked move always looks special until it is counted everywhere else.

Saved study q#b1d3ecb3 @ dataset 85fdc316, counted 22 Sep 2026 08:33 UTC.

Saved summary text, as written 22 Sep 2026

Written automatically when this study was saved and kept as written; where a line differs from the counts above, the counts govern.

Minutes like this appeared only 16 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often higher: 10 of the 16 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (63%).
10 rose and 6 fell over 16 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.5 a day over 31 days, but 2026-09-18 alone holds 50% of them: this is close to a single episode.

The other reading times, as written

From 15 minutes before

Minutes like this appeared only 16 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often higher: 9 of the 16 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (56%).
9 rose and 7 fell over 16 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.5 a day over 31 days, but 2026-09-18 alone holds 50% of them: this is close to a single episode.

From 1 hour before

Minutes like this appeared only 6 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often higher: 5 of the 6 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (83%).
5 rose and 1 fell over 6 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.2 a day over 31 days, but 2026-09-18 alone holds 50% of them: this is close to a single episode.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 16 matches came on 3 of 30 days, 11 during the rise.

When the matches happened3 of 30 days
  • 5 Sep4 matches
  • 16 Sep4 matches
  • 18 Sep8 matches

No matches on the other 27 days.

Of the 16 matches, 5 came before the rise began, 11 during it and 0 after it.

Neighbouring minutes overlap, so these are not 16 separate trials.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 16 matches came on 3 of 30 days, 11 during the rise.

Other time frames30 minutes to 7 days

The answer uses 30 minutes, the time frame this study counted by default. Each row counts the same matches at a later close, in both directions. The bars show how often price was 2% or more higher at each time frame: first the matches, then any BR minute.

  1. 30 minutes
    Matches4 of 16 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any BR minute
    4,138 of 43,161 (9.6%)

    0 of 16 were 2% or more lower; any BR minute 3,159 of 43,161 (7.3%).

    Every match has a 30-minute close.

    At least 11 of these windows overlap the rise.

  2. 1 hour
    Matches7 of 16 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any BR minute
    6,394 of 43,131 (14.8%)

    1 of 16 was 2% or more lower; any BR minute 5,115 of 43,131 (11.9%).

    Every match has a 1-hour close.

    At least 11 of these windows overlap the rise.

  3. 4 hours
    Matches9 of 16 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any BR minute
    11,528 of 42,951 (26.8%)

    1 of 16 was 2% or more lower; any BR minute 11,191 of 42,951 (26.1%).

    Every match has a 4-hour close.

    At least 11 of these windows overlap the rise.

  4. 24 hours
    Matches12 of 16 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any BR minute
    18,051 of 41,751 (43.2%)

    4 of 16 were 2% or more lower; any BR minute 17,964 of 41,751 (43.0%).

    Every match has a 24-hour close.

    At least 11 of these windows overlap the rise.

  5. 72 hours
    Matches12 of 16 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any BR minute
    22,255 of 38,871 (57.3%)

    4 of 16 were 2% or more lower; any BR minute 15,001 of 38,871 (38.6%).

    Every match has a 72-hour close.

  6. 7 days
    Matches0 of 4 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any BR minute
    21,374 of 33,111 (64.6%)

    4 of 4 were 2% or more lower; any BR minute 10,687 of 33,111 (32.3%).

    12 without a 7-day close yet, left out.

0%100%

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 16 matches came on 3 of 30 days, 11 during the rise.

Readings at five times before the rise24 hours to 1 minute before · 2 other times tried

Highlights follow fixed rules, not significance tests. Proposed conditions round values or use ranges; inspect them before running.

  1. 24 hours before · 15 Sep 09:00 UTC · 10 of 87 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.62 or higherBook capture is native1-hour range against usual 0.42 or lower4-hour range against usual 2.2 or higherLiquidation bunching 0.63 or higherDepth capture is liveTouches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hours15-minute price change -0.011 or lowerDistance from the day's average price -0.19 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.6231≥ 0.62
    Book capture feature.book_sourcenativenative
    Compression · 1h feature.candle_compression_1h0.4116≤ 0.42
    Compression · 4h feature.candle_compression_4h2.21≥ 2.2
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.632≥ 0.63
    Depth capture feature.depth_sourcelivelive
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break50912 to 720
    Return · 15m feature.ret_15m-0.01102≤ -0.011
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.1934≤ -0.19
  2. 4 hours before · 16 Sep 05:00 UTC · 11 of 87 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.78 or higherBook capture is nativeEngulfing (15m) is bearishSweep + reclaim (15m) is bullishSweep + reclaim (1h) is bullishLiquidation bunching 0.62 or higherDepth capture is liveTouches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hours15-minute price change -0.012 or lowerDistance from the day's average price -0.054 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.79≥ 0.78
    Book capture feature.book_sourcenativenative
    Engulfing · 15m feature.candle_engulfing_15mbearishbearish
    Sweep + reclaim · 15m feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_15mbullishbullish
    Sweep + reclaim · 1h feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_1hbullishbullish
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.6245≥ 0.62
    Depth capture feature.depth_sourcelivelive
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break52912 to 720
    Return · 15m feature.ret_15m-0.0129≤ -0.012
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.05425≤ -0.054
  3. 1 hour before · 16 Sep 08:00 UTC · 12 of 87 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.98 or higherBook capture is native4-hour range against usual 0.27 or lowerSweep + reclaim (15m) is bullishSweep + reclaim (1h) is bullishLiquidation bunching 0.6 or higherDepth capture is liveTouches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursMinutes to funding 1 or lower1-hour price change -0.034 or lowerDistance from the day's average price -0.074 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.9845≥ 0.98
    Book capture feature.book_sourcenativenative
    Compression · 4h feature.candle_compression_4h0.263≤ 0.27
    Sweep + reclaim · 15m feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_15mbullishbullish
    Sweep + reclaim · 1h feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_1hbullishbullish
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.604≥ 0.6
    Depth capture feature.depth_sourcelivelive
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break53212 to 720
    Minutes to funding feature.mins_to_funding0≤ 1
    Return · 1h feature.ret_1h-0.03401≤ -0.034
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.07481≤ -0.074
  4. 15 minutes before · 16 Sep 08:45 UTC · 11 of 87 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.63 or higherBook capture is native4-hour range against usual 0.27 or lowerContainment (15m) is insideSweep + reclaim (1h) is bullishLiquidation bunching 0.59 or higherDepth capture is liveTouches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hours15-minute price change -0.017 or lowerDistance from the day's average price -0.073 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.6376≥ 0.63
    Book capture feature.book_sourcenativenative
    Compression · 4h feature.candle_compression_4h0.263≤ 0.27
    Containment · 15m feature.candle_containment_15minsideinside
    Sweep + reclaim · 1h feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_1hbullishbullish
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.5968≥ 0.59
    Depth capture feature.depth_sourcelivelive
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break532.812 to 720
    Return · 15m feature.ret_15m-0.01728≤ -0.017
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.07397≤ -0.073
  5. 1 minute before · 16 Sep 08:59 UTC · 10 of 87 stood out

    Order book lopsidedness 0.053 or lowerBook capture is native4-hour range against usual 0.27 or lowerContainment (15m) is insideSweep + reclaim (1h) is bullishLiquidation bunching 0.59 or higherDepth capture is liveTouches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursDistance from the day's average price -0.077 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance percentile feature.book_imbalance_pctrank0.05201≤ 0.053
    Book capture feature.book_sourcenativenative
    Compression · 4h feature.candle_compression_4h0.263≤ 0.27
    Containment · 15m feature.candle_containment_15minsideinside
    Sweep + reclaim · 1h feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_1hbullishbullish
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.5968≥ 0.59
    Depth capture feature.depth_sourcelivelive
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break53312 to 720
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.07706≤ -0.077

Two other reading times we tried 16 and 6 matches

15 minutes before (08:45): order book tilt 0.63 or higher, book capture is native, 4-hour range against usual 0.27 or lower.

Book imbalance · top levels ≥ 0.63 and Book capture native and Compression · 4h ≤ 0.27

16 matches: price was 2% or more higher after 30 minutes in 3 of 16, and 2% or more lower in 1 of 16.

Of the 16 matches, 5 came before the rise began, 11 during it and 0 after it.

1 hour before (08:00): order book tilt 0.98 or higher, book capture is native, 4-hour range against usual 0.27 or lower.

Book imbalance · top levels ≥ 0.98 and Book capture native and Compression · 4h ≤ 0.27

6 matches: price was 2% or more higher after 30 minutes in 1 of 6, and 2% or more lower in 1 of 6.

Of the 6 matches, 2 came before the rise began, 4 during it and 0 after it.

Fewer than 30 results, so no rate is printed.

No set had 30 matches before the rise; the saved study leads with the one that had the most.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 16 matches came on 3 of 30 days, 11 during the rise.

Hourly candles around the risefull context, lead-up, move

The 09:00 start was picked after the move.

Price history: lead-up and selected move
selected startreadings taken here+576%0.183660.537421.5726Sep 15 07:00Sep 16 09:00Sep 20 14:00UTC · log price scale

Hourly candles, UTC. The marked lines are the minutes the readings came from: 1 minute, 15 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours and 24 hours before the selected start.

Other ways to test itsame dates

Multiple recorded sectors: sector_crypto, sector_defi. Choose one explicitly.

Each opens Review the test; nothing runs until you press Run.

Running needs a free account and uses your allowance; you see the cost first.

Starting defaults and coverage

Starting defaults: 2026-08-23 to 2026-09-22 UTC; finishes up 2% or more after 1 hour. Review or change the markets, dates, conditions and outcome before running. Current recorded classification and sector tags, not point-in-time membership. Historical membership may differ. Instrument history does not guarantee every setup input or outcome is present; actual study exclusions remain authoritative.