Research is a work in progress. Estimated release: 1 December 2026. Our goal is to make it a search engine for trading setups in recorded crypto markets.

BTWBTWUSDTBinance USDT-M
Saved 5 Sep 2026 · will not change

BTWUSDT rose 94% on 1 September 2026

What happenedUp 94% from the 13:00 UTC open to the 21:00 high on 2 September.Chart
Before itAt 12:45, 6 of 58 readings stood out; 3 were tested together.Setup
The recordToo few results to compare.Result

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Next step

What happened

Readings0.78600.357912:0001 Sep12:0002 Sep12:0003 SepHighest trade 0.75643 in the 21:00 UTC hour on 2 September

Price opened the 13:00 hour at 0.3898 and reached a highest trade of 0.7564 in the 21:00 hour; the tested readings were taken at 12:45.

What stood out at 12:45

12:45 always meets its own rules.

What the record says

5 Aug to 3 Sep 2026

Too few results to compare

Price at least 2% higher after 30 minutes

This setup
0/22 measured outcomes · fewer than 30, so no rate is printed
Any BTW minute, same dates
6,394/43,171 (14.8%)
0%20%

22 matches in 43,201 minutes checked.

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Evidence
At least 2% lower after 30 minutes
2% or more lower: 3 of 22; the other 19 closed less than 2% either way.
Direction only, any size, after 30 minutes
13 at or above the match price, 9 below; most of both were under 2% (19 of 22).
Reference
Every BTW minute from 5 August to 3 September 2026 with a 30-minute close, the 22 matches included; not a matched control group. 30 minutes at the end of the dates had no 30-minute close yet and are left out, not counted as zero.
Did not reach the outcome
22 of 22 were not 2% or more higher.
Not a trading test
Entry, exit, fees, slippage and risk are not tested.

Does it hold on more dates?

Test it on the 30 days before

Nothing runs until you press Run.

Details
Exactly what was counted3 conditions · 22 of 43,201 minutes · saved text
  • Order book tilt -0.8 or lower. Size at the best bid against the best ask; above 0 means more bids, below 0 more asks.Book imbalance · top levels ≤ -0.8 · feature.book_imbalance
  • 15-minute range against usual 0.47 or lower. The last finished 15-minute candle's high to low range, as a multiple of its usual range.Compression · 15m ≤ 0.47 · feature.candle_compression_15m
  • 1-hour range against usual 0.36 or lower. The last finished 1-hour candle's high to low range, as a multiple of its usual range.the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline ≤ 0.36 · feature.candle_compression_1h

Read at 15 minutes before the move.

Read at 12:45 UTC on 1 September, 15 minutes before the selected 13:00 start.

BTW only, 5 August to 3 September 2026 (UTC, ending 4 September 00:00); all 3 readings had values on 43,201 of those minutes.

Reference: every BTW minute over the same dates, matches included; it is not a matched control group.

Outcome: the close exactly 30 minutes later, not the highest or lowest price along the way.

The 13:00 start was picked automatically after the move.

BTWUSDT stored readings end 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC (exclusive). Prices and tick replay have separate coverage.

The feature manifest spans the lead-up. Individual minutes or inputs can still be unavailable.

This is not a similarity search. Each count matches the exact readings above and nothing else.

Picked in hindsight: the counts include every other time these readings appeared, not just this move.

Fires often arrive as clusters of consecutive minutes, and forward windows overlap. A cluster is one episode, not many independent trials.

If these counts read weaker than the move suggested, that is the tool working: the lead-up of a picked move always looks special until it is counted everywhere else.

Saved study q#53b88315 @ dataset ea3968f0, counted 5 Sep 2026 07:57 UTC.

Saved summary text, as written 5 Sep 2026

Written automatically when this study was saved and kept as written; where a line differs from the counts above, the counts govern.

Minutes like this appeared only 22 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often higher: 13 of the 22 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (59%).
13 rose and 9 fell over 22 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.7 a day, on 14 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

It counts the single minute on 4 September as a day.

The other reading times, as written

From 1 minute before

Minutes like this appeared only 13 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often higher: 10 of the 13 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (77%).
10 rose and 3 fell over 13 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.4 a day, on 10 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

From 1 hour before

Minutes like this appeared only 13 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was close to a coin flip: 7 rose and 6 fell over the next 30 minutes (13 of the 13 matches have a complete 30 minutes forward).
7 rose and 6 fell over 13 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.4 a day, on 10 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 22 matches came on 14 of 30 days.

When the matches happened14 of 30 days
  • 8 Aug1 match
  • 9 Aug1 match
  • 13 Aug2 matches
  • 14 Aug2 matches
  • 16 Aug1 match
  • 17 Aug1 match
  • 18 Aug1 match
  • 20 Aug1 match
  • 26 Aug1 match
  • 27 Aug1 match
  • 29 Aug2 matches
  • 30 Aug4 matches
  • 1 Sep1 match
  • 3 Sep3 matches

No matches on the other 16 days.

Of the 22 matches, 19 came before the rise began, 0 during it and 3 after it.

Neighbouring minutes overlap, so these are not 22 separate trials.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 22 matches came on 14 of 30 days.

Other time frames30 minutes to 7 days

The answer uses 30 minutes, the time frame this study counted by default. Each row counts the same matches at a later close, in both directions. The bars show how often price was 2% or more higher at each time frame: first the matches, then any BTW minute.

  1. 30 minutes
    Matches0 of 22 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any BTW minute
    6,394 of 43,171 (14.8%)

    3 of 22 were 2% or more lower; any BTW minute 5,166 of 43,171 (12.0%).

    Every match has a 30-minute close.

  2. 1 hour
    Matches4 of 22 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any BTW minute
    9,568 of 43,141 (22.2%)

    4 of 22 were 2% or more lower; any BTW minute 6,720 of 43,141 (15.6%).

    Every match has a 1-hour close.

  3. 4 hours
    Matches8 of 22 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any BTW minute
    17,516 of 42,961 (40.8%)

    5 of 22 were 2% or more lower; any BTW minute 9,543 of 42,961 (22.2%).

    Every match has a 4-hour close.

  4. 24 hours
    Matches12 of 19 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any BTW minute
    23,311 of 41,761 (55.8%)

    3 of 19 were 2% or more lower; any BTW minute 12,399 of 41,761 (29.7%).

    3 without a 24-hour close yet, left out.

  5. 72 hours
    Matches13 of 18 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any BTW minute
    24,537 of 38,881 (63.1%)

    2 of 18 were 2% or more lower; any BTW minute 9,661 of 38,881 (24.8%).

    4 without a 72-hour close yet, left out.

    At least 4 of these windows overlap the rise.

  6. 7 days
    Matches11 of 12 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any BTW minute
    24,220 of 33,121 (73.1%)

    0 of 12 were 2% or more lower; any BTW minute 7,509 of 33,121 (22.7%).

    10 without a 7-day close yet, left out.

    At least 2 of these windows overlap the rise.

0%100%

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 22 matches came on 14 of 30 days.

Readings at five times before the rise24 hours to 1 minute before · 2 other times tried

Highlights follow fixed rules, not significance tests. Proposed conditions round values or use ranges; inspect them before running.

  1. 24 hours before · 31 Aug 13:00 UTC · 5 of 58 stood out

    Order book tilt -0.93 or lower4-hour range against usual 0.26 or lowerLower wick (15m) 0.74 or higherSweep + reclaim (15m) is bullishLiquidation bunching 0.55 or higher
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance-0.9323≤ -0.93
    the last four-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_4h0.2572≤ 0.26
    Lower wick · 15m feature.candle_lower_wick_15m0.7424≥ 0.74
    Sweep + reclaim · 15m feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_15mbullishbullish
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.5517≥ 0.55
  2. 4 hours before · 1 Sep 09:00 UTC · 6 of 58 stood out

    1-hour range against usual 0.45 or lower4-hour range against usual 2.2 or higherEngulfing (1h) is bearishSweep + reclaim (1h) is bullishLiquidation bunching 0.56 or higherDistance from the day's average price -0.063 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_1h0.4412≤ 0.45
    the last four-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_4h2.276≥ 2.2
    Engulfing · 1h feature.candle_engulfing_1hbearishbearish
    Sweep + reclaim · 1h feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_1hbullishbullish
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.5666≥ 0.56
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.06389≤ -0.063
  3. 1 hour before · 1 Sep 12:00 UTC · 6 of 58 stood out

    15-minute range against usual 0.4 or lower1-hour range against usual 0.36 or lowerContainment (15m) is insideUpper wick (15m) 0.61 or higherLiquidation bunching 0.56 or higherDistance from the day's average price -0.047 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Compression · 15m feature.candle_compression_15m0.3998≤ 0.4
    the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_1h0.3526≤ 0.36
    Containment · 15m feature.candle_containment_15minsideinside
    Upper wick · 15m feature.candle_upper_wick_15m0.6121≥ 0.61
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.568≥ 0.56
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.0477≤ -0.047
  4. 15 minutes before · 1 Sep 12:45 UTC · 6 of 58 stood out

    Order book tilt -0.8 or lower15-minute range against usual 0.47 or lower1-hour range against usual 0.36 or lowerContainment (15m) is insideLiquidation bunching 0.56 or higherDistance from the day's average price -0.046 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance-0.8045≤ -0.8
    Compression · 15m feature.candle_compression_15m0.4698≤ 0.47
    the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_1h0.3526≤ 0.36
    Containment · 15m feature.candle_containment_15minsideinside
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.568≥ 0.56
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.04655≤ -0.046
  5. 1 minute before · 1 Sep 12:59 UTC · 7 of 58 stood out

    Order book tilt -0.95 or lowerOrder book lopsidedness 0.061 or lower15-minute range against usual 0.47 or lower1-hour range against usual 0.36 or lowerContainment (15m) is insideLiquidation bunching 0.56 or higherDistance from the day's average price -0.045 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance-0.9595≤ -0.95
    Book imbalance percentile feature.book_imbalance_pctrank0.06072≤ 0.061
    Compression · 15m feature.candle_compression_15m0.4698≤ 0.47
    the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_1h0.3526≤ 0.36
    Containment · 15m feature.candle_containment_15minsideinside
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.568≥ 0.56
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.04596≤ -0.045

Two other reading times we tried 13 and 13 matches

1 minute before (12:59): order book tilt -0.95 or lower, order book lopsidedness 0.061 or lower, 15-minute range against usual 0.47 or lower.

Book imbalance · top levels ≤ -0.95 and Book imbalance percentile ≤ 0.061 and Compression · 15m ≤ 0.47

13 matches: price was 2% or more higher after 30 minutes in 0 of 13, and 2% or more lower in 1 of 13.

Of the 13 matches, 11 came before the rise began, 1 during it and 1 after it.

1 hour before (12:00): 15-minute range against usual 0.4 or lower, 1-hour range against usual 0.36 or lower, containment (15m) is inside.

Compression · 15m ≤ 0.4 and the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline ≤ 0.36 and Containment · 15m inside

13 matches: price was 2% or more higher after 30 minutes in 1 of 13, and 2% or more lower in 1 of 13.

Of the 13 matches, 12 came before the rise began, 0 during it and 1 after it.

Fewer than 30 results, so no rate is printed.

No set had 30 matches before the rise; the saved study leads with the one that had the most.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 22 matches came on 14 of 30 days.

Hourly candles around the risefull context, lead-up, move

The 13:00 start was picked after the move, and the hour before was already rising.

Price history: lead-up and selected move
selected startreadings taken here+94%0.365940.537050.78817Aug 31 11:00Sep 1 13:00Sep 3 01:00UTC · log price scale

Hourly candles, UTC. The marked lines are the minutes the readings came from: 1 minute, 15 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours and 24 hours before the selected start.

Other ways to test itsame dates

Same 3 conditions on BTW, 6 July to 4 August 2026.

Each opens Review the test.

Running needs a free account and uses your allowance; you see the cost first.