LABUSDT fell into Sep 9
−53%
Counted on 2026-09-12, against a record covering to 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC. These numbers are frozen: this page will always say what it said the day it was written.
This move is in the event archive as a flash crash on 2026-09-09. Open the archived event
Exact setup countedBook imbalance · top levels ≤ -0.56 and Book imbalance percentile ≤ 0.08 and Sweep + reclaim · 15m bearish · Read at 1 hour before the move.
After 30 minutes this setup fell 2% or more in 0 of 41 complete windows (0.0%), against 2.9% with no condition (1,251 of 43,171): 0.00x.
Best point inside 30 minutes reached +5% or more in 0 of 41 complete windows; worst point fell 5% or more in 0 of 41.
Multiple recorded sectors: sector_alpha, sector_crypto. Choose one explicitly.
Starting defaults and coverage
Starting defaults: 2026-08-12 to 2026-09-11 UTC; finishes down 2% or more after 1 hour. Review or change the markets, dates, conditions and outcome before running. Current recorded classification and sector tags, not point-in-time membership. Historical membership may differ. Instrument history does not guarantee every setup input or outcome is present; actual study exclusions remain authoritative.
Choose the study population explicitly: This market only · Every recorded market
Watch the ignition replay Free replay covers the latest fully archived UTC day on 6 major markets. Pro reaches 90 days; Research reaches the whole recorded order book, which begins 15 May 2026. Earlier days are searchable but hold no book, so they cannot be replayed. Access is checked when you open a replay.
Evidence and counting
Read at 1 hour before the move.
Of the 41 fires, 37 came before the move began and 3 happened while it was already under way. A fire during the move sees it; it does not telegraph it.
About 1.3 a day, on 21 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.
This is not a similarity search. Each count matches the exact readings above and nothing else.
Picked in hindsight: the counts include every other time these readings appeared, not just this move.
Fires often arrive as clusters of consecutive minutes, and forward windows overlap. A cluster is one episode, not many independent trials.
If these counts read weaker than the move suggested, that is the tool working: the lead-up of a picked move always looks special until it is counted everywhere else.
Explore the move and its lead-up
Hourly candles. The marked lines are the minutes the readings came from: 1 minute, 15 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours and 24 hours before the selected start. These five samples test the lead-up only, not the full move. Use the minute inspector to explore during or after the move.
Explore historical state
Current-minute reads are free after sign-in. Pro and Research include historical-minute inspection and comparison with an hour earlier.
Past readings use stored inputs where available. Recent minutes may use the live buffer and are labelled unpinned. Missing minutes remain visible.
Read the available analytical inputs at one minute, including measurements over the preceding windows. Compare with an hour earlier, then take a reading into Research to test it. Dates are UTC.
These additional reads are separate from the five pre-start samples. Observations during or after the selected move describe what had already happened; they are not advance evidence.
Selected time: 2026-09-06 02:00 UTC. During the selected move: hindsight. Choose Read this minute to request it. Missing minutes remain unavailable.
Follow positioning and flow through the move
Read 24 sampled minutes from the selected start through one hour after the selected end. The peak hour has extra 15-minute samples. The end marks the peak hour, not the exact peak tick. These are separate snapshots, not a continuous tape or an advance-warning test.
Historical access applies. Reads preserve each source revision; missing values stay unavailable. Contract OI, turnover and direct spot basis are not supplied by this table. Published premium is a different measure from direct basis.
No additional reads have run.
The OI score measures absolute USD-notional change, not signed contract growth. Zero 15-second liquidation intensity can coexist with substantial hourly liquidations. Binance liquidation amounts are observed publications, not complete venue totals.
Pre-start evidence: five separate snapshots
Highlighted readings and exact search conditions
Highlighted readings meet fixed rules, not a statistical-significance test. The observed value and proposed search condition are different: a condition rounds a value or selects an interval for a repeatable search.
- -24h2026-09-05 02:00 UTC
At 24 hours before the move, 9 of the 63 readings met a highlight rule.
Book imbalance · top levels ≤ -0.99Engulfing · 1h bearishSweep + reclaim · 15m bullishSweep + reclaim · 1h bearishCascade clustering ≥ 0.54how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested ≥ 3how long ago the descending resistance broke 12 to 720how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested ≥ 3how long ago the short descending resistance broke 12 to 720Show the full readings
READING BEFORE THE MOVE SEARCHES FOR Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance -0.9903 ≤ -0.99 Engulfing · 1h feature.candle_engulfing_1h bearish bearish Sweep + reclaim · 15m feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_15m bullish bullish Sweep + reclaim · 1h feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_1h bearish bearish Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index 0.5474 ≥ 0.54 how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches 4 ≥ 3 how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break 35 12 to 720 how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches 7 ≥ 3 how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break 346 12 to 720 - -4h2026-09-05 22:00 UTC
At 4 hours before the move, 6 of the 63 readings met a highlight rule.
the last four-hour candle range versus its baseline ≤ 0.46Cascade clustering ≥ 0.52how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested ≥ 3how long ago the descending resistance broke 12 to 720how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested ≥ 3how long ago the short descending resistance broke 12 to 720Show the full readings
READING BEFORE THE MOVE SEARCHES FOR the last four-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_4h 0.4558 ≤ 0.46 Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index 0.5245 ≥ 0.52 how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches 4 ≥ 3 how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break 55 12 to 720 how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches 7 ≥ 3 how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break 366 12 to 720 - -1h2026-09-06 01:00 UTC
At 1 hour before the move, 9 of the 63 readings met a highlight rule.
Book imbalance · top levels ≤ -0.56Book imbalance percentile ≤ 0.08Sweep + reclaim · 15m bearishCascade clustering ≥ 0.52how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested ≥ 3how long ago the descending resistance broke 12 to 720how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested ≥ 3how long ago the short descending resistance broke 12 to 720Taker buy share · 15m ≥ 0.65Show the full readings
READING BEFORE THE MOVE SEARCHES FOR Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance -0.5682 ≤ -0.56 Book imbalance percentile feature.book_imbalance_pctrank 0.07954 ≤ 0.08 Sweep + reclaim · 15m feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_15m bearish bearish Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index 0.5233 ≥ 0.52 how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches 4 ≥ 3 how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break 58 12 to 720 how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches 7 ≥ 3 how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break 369 12 to 720 Taker buy share · 15m feature.taker_buy_ratio_15m 0.6587 ≥ 0.65 - -15m2026-09-06 01:45 UTC
At 15 minutes before the move, 6 of the 63 readings met a highlight rule.
Book imbalance · top levels ≥ 0.93Cascade clustering ≥ 0.51how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested ≥ 3how long ago the descending resistance broke 12 to 720how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested ≥ 3how long ago the short descending resistance broke 12 to 720Show the full readings
READING BEFORE THE MOVE SEARCHES FOR Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance 0.9326 ≥ 0.93 Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index 0.5197 ≥ 0.51 how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches 4 ≥ 3 how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break 58.75 12 to 720 how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches 7 ≥ 3 how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break 369.8 12 to 720 - -1m2026-09-06 01:59 UTC
At 1 minute before the move, 5 of the 63 readings met a highlight rule.
Cascade clustering ≥ 0.51how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested ≥ 3how long ago the descending resistance broke 12 to 720how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested ≥ 3how long ago the short descending resistance broke 12 to 720Show the full readings
READING BEFORE THE MOVE SEARCHES FOR Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index 0.5197 ≥ 0.51 how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches 4 ≥ 3 how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break 58.98 12 to 720 how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches 7 ≥ 3 how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break 370 12 to 720
Also counted
Cascade clustering ≥ 0.51 and how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested ≥ 3 and how long ago the descending resistance broke 12 to 7204 matches, 2 rose, 2 fell
Read at 1 minute before the move.
2 rose and 2 fell over 4 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
Of the 4 fires, 3 came before the move began; none were during it.
About 0.1 a day, on 4 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.
Book imbalance · top levels ≥ 0.93 and Cascade clustering ≥ 0.51 and how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested ≥ 3149 matches, 77 rose, 71 fell
Read at 15 minutes before the move.
After 7 days this setup rose 2% or more in 7 of 89 complete windows (7.9%), against 15.5% with no condition (5,145 of 33,121): 0.51x.
Best point inside 7 days reached +5% or more in 62 of 89 complete windows; worst point fell 5% or more in 72 of 89.
Of the 149 fires, 126 came before the move began and 3 happened while it was already under way. A fire during the move sees it; it does not telegraph it.
About 4.8 a day, on 12 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.
Every night the record counts what fired and what usually followed: the daily brief.
No account? Replay a real move tick by tick, free: TUT short squeeze · 9 Aug 2026.