Research is a work in progress. Estimated release: 1 December 2026. Our goal is to make it a search engine for trading setups in recorded crypto markets.

RAYRAYSOLUSDTBinance USDT-M
Saved 13 Sep 2026 · will not change

RAYSOLUSDT rose 57% on 6 September 2026

What happenedUp 57% from the 01:00 UTC open to the 17:00 high.Chart
Before itAt 00:45, 11 of 63 readings stood out; 3 were tested together.Setup
The recordToo few results to compare.Result

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Next step

What happened

Readings1.4850.865806 Sep03:0006:0009:0012:0015:0018:0021:00Highest trade 1.4422 in the 17:00 UTC hour on 6 September

Price opened the 01:00 hour at 0.9185 and reached a highest trade of 1.442 in the 17:00 hour; the tested readings were taken at 00:45.

What stood out at 00:45

00:45 always meets its own rules.

What the record says

14 Aug to 12 Sep 2026

Too few results to compare

Price at least 2% higher after 30 minutes

This setup
1/7 measured outcomes · fewer than 30, so no rate is printed
Any RAYSOL minute, same dates
1,760/40,777 (4.3%)
0%5%

7 matches in 43,201 minutes checked.

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Evidence
At least 2% lower after 30 minutes
2% or more lower: 1 of 7; the other 5 closed less than 2% either way.
Direction only, any size, after 30 minutes
5 at or above the match price, 2 below; most of both were under 2% (5 of 7).
Reference
Every RAYSOL minute from 14 August to 12 September 2026 with a 30-minute close, the 7 matches included; not a matched control group. 2,424 minutes at the end of the dates had no 30-minute close yet and are left out, not counted as zero.
Did not reach the outcome
6 of 7 were not 2% or more higher.
Not a trading test
Entry, exit, fees, slippage and risk are not tested.

Does it hold on other markets?

Test it on the 520 sector crypto markets

No result for these markets has been measured; nothing runs until you press Run.

Details
Exactly what was counted3 conditions · 7 of 43,201 minutes · saved text
  • Order book lopsidedness 0.083 or lower. How lopsided the sizes at the best bid and ask were, either way, against recent readings; low means unusually even.Book imbalance percentile ≤ 0.083 · feature.book_imbalance_pctrank
  • 4-hour range against usual 2.5 or higher. The last finished 4-hour candle's high to low range, as a multiple of its usual range.the last four-hour candle range versus its baseline ≥ 2.5 · feature.candle_compression_4h
  • Volatility rank 0.93 or higher. How volatile the last hour was against this market's history, on a 0 to 1 scale.Realized vol percentile ≥ 0.93 · feature.realized_vol_pctrank

Read at 15 minutes before the move.

Read at 00:45 UTC on 6 September, 15 minutes before the selected 01:00 start.

RAYSOL only, 14 August to 12 September 2026 (UTC, ending 13 September 00:00); all 3 readings had values on 43,201 of those minutes.

Reference: every RAYSOL minute over the same dates, matches included; it is not a matched control group.

Outcome: the close exactly 30 minutes later, not the highest or lowest price along the way.

The 01:00 start was picked automatically after the move.

RAYSOLUSDT stored readings end 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC (exclusive). Prices and tick replay have separate coverage.

The feature manifest spans the lead-up. Individual minutes or inputs can still be unavailable.

This is not a similarity search. Each count matches the exact readings above and nothing else.

Picked in hindsight: the counts include every other time these readings appeared, not just this move.

Fires often arrive as clusters of consecutive minutes, and forward windows overlap. A cluster is one episode, not many independent trials.

If these counts read weaker than the move suggested, that is the tool working: the lead-up of a picked move always looks special until it is counted everywhere else.

Saved study q#be2eda9f @ dataset 0848795c, counted 13 Sep 2026 08:14 UTC.

Saved summary text, as written 13 Sep 2026

Written automatically when this study was saved and kept as written; where a line differs from the counts above, the counts govern.

Minutes like this appeared only 7 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often higher: 5 of the 7 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (71%).
5 rose and 2 fell over 7 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.2 a day over 31 days, but 2026-09-06 alone holds 57% of them: this is close to a single episode.

The other reading times, as written

From 1 minute before

Minutes like this appeared only 6 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often lower: 4 of the 6 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward fell (67%).
2 rose and 4 fell over 6 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.2 a day, on 4 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

From 1 hour before

Minutes like this appeared only 6 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often higher: 4 of the 6 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (67%).
4 rose and 2 fell over 6 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.2 a day over 31 days, but 2026-09-06 alone holds 67% of them: this is close to a single episode.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 7 matches came on 4 of 30 days, 3 during the rise.

When the matches happened4 of 30 days
  • 19 Aug1 match
  • 20 Aug1 match
  • 31 Aug1 match
  • 6 Sep4 matches

No matches on the other 26 days.

Of the 7 matches, 4 came before the rise began, 3 during it and 0 after it.

Neighbouring minutes overlap, so these are not 7 separate trials.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 7 matches came on 4 of 30 days, 3 during the rise.

Other time frames30 minutes to 7 days

The answer uses 30 minutes, the time frame this study counted by default. Each row counts the same matches at a later close, in both directions. The bars show how often price was 2% or more higher at each time frame: first the matches, then any RAYSOL minute.

  1. 30 minutes
    Matches1 of 7 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any RAYSOL minute
    1,760 of 40,777 (4.3%)

    1 of 7 was 2% or more lower; any RAYSOL minute 1,291 of 40,777 (3.2%).

    Every match has a 30-minute close.

    At least 3 of these windows overlap the rise.

  2. 1 hour
    Matches2 of 7 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any RAYSOL minute
    3,218 of 40,770 (7.9%)

    1 of 7 was 2% or more lower; any RAYSOL minute 2,448 of 40,770 (6.0%).

    Every match has a 1-hour close.

    At least 3 of these windows overlap the rise.

  3. 4 hours
    Matches3 of 7 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any RAYSOL minute
    7,817 of 40,558 (19.3%)

    1 of 7 was 2% or more lower; any RAYSOL minute 5,520 of 40,558 (13.6%).

    Every match has a 4-hour close.

    At least 4 of these windows overlap the rise.

  4. 24 hours
    Matches6 of 7 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any RAYSOL minute
    17,855 of 39,472 (45.2%)

    0 of 7 were 2% or more lower; any RAYSOL minute 7,910 of 39,472 (20.0%).

    Every match has a 24-hour close.

    At least 4 of these windows overlap the rise.

  5. 72 hours
    Matches6 of 7 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any RAYSOL minute
    25,540 of 37,033 (69.0%)

    0 of 7 were 2% or more lower; any RAYSOL minute 2,787 of 37,033 (7.5%).

    Every match has a 72-hour close.

    At least 4 of these windows overlap the rise.

  6. 7 days
    Matches4 of 4 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any RAYSOL minute
    28,231 of 31,639 (89.2%)

    0 of 4 were 2% or more lower; any RAYSOL minute 234 of 31,639 (0.7%).

    3 without a 7-day close yet, left out.

    At least 1 of these windows overlap the rise.

0%100%

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 7 matches came on 4 of 30 days, 3 during the rise.

Readings at five times before the rise24 hours to 1 minute before · 2 other times tried

Highlights follow fixed rules, not significance tests. Proposed conditions round values or use ranges; inspect them before running.

  1. 24 hours before · 5 Sep 01:00 UTC · 9 of 63 stood out

    Order book lopsidedness 0.94 or higher1-hour range against usual 0.33 or lowerThe distance from price back to the broken descending resistance between -0.5 and 0.5How many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720The distance from price back to the broken short descending resistance between -0.5 and 0.5Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursTaker buy share (15m) 0.22 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance percentile feature.book_imbalance_pctrank0.9413≥ 0.94
    the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_1h0.3264≤ 0.33
    the distance from price back to the broken descending resistance feature.desc_resistance_broken_dist_atr-0.0826-0.5 to 0.5
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches5≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break3412 to 720
    the distance from price back to the broken short descending resistance feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_dist_atr-0.0826-0.5 to 0.5
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches5≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break3412 to 720
    Taker buy share · 15m feature.taker_buy_ratio_15m0.2154≤ 0.22
  2. 4 hours before · 5 Sep 21:00 UTC · 9 of 63 stood out

    4-hour range against usual 2.1 or higherEngulfing (15m) is bearishSweep + reclaim (1h) is bearishHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursVPIN regime is elevatedDistance from the day's average price 0.02 or higher
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    the last four-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_4h2.151≥ 2.1
    Engulfing · 15m feature.candle_engulfing_15mbearishbearish
    Sweep + reclaim · 1h feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_1hbearishbearish
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches5≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break5412 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches5≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break5412 to 720
    VPIN regime feature.vpin_regimeelevatedelevated
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist0.02027≥ 0.02
  3. 1 hour before · 6 Sep 00:00 UTC · 13 of 63 stood out

    Order book lopsidedness 0.066 or lower4-hour range against usual 2.5 or higherSweep + reclaim (15m) is bearishUpper wick (15m) 0.88 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursMinutes to funding 1 or lowerVolatility rank 0.99 or higherToxic flow (VPIN) 0.51 or higherVPIN regime is elevatedDistance from the day's average price 0.042 or higher
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance percentile feature.book_imbalance_pctrank0.06597≤ 0.066
    the last four-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_4h2.511≥ 2.5
    Sweep + reclaim · 15m feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_15mbearishbearish
    Upper wick · 15m feature.candle_upper_wick_15m0.8865≥ 0.88
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches5≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break5712 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches5≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break5712 to 720
    Minutes to funding feature.mins_to_funding0≤ 1
    Realized vol percentile feature.realized_vol_pctrank0.9968≥ 0.99
    Toxic flow (VPIN) feature.vpin0.5194≥ 0.51
    VPIN regime feature.vpin_regimeelevatedelevated
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist0.04266≥ 0.042
  4. 15 minutes before · 6 Sep 00:45 UTC · 11 of 63 stood out

    Order book lopsidedness 0.083 or lower4-hour range against usual 2.5 or higherEngulfing (15m) is bullishHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursVolatility rank 0.93 or higher15-minute price change 0.012 or higherToxic flow (VPIN) 0.52 or higherVPIN regime is elevated
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance percentile feature.book_imbalance_pctrank0.0826≤ 0.083
    the last four-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_4h2.511≥ 2.5
    Engulfing · 15m feature.candle_engulfing_15mbullishbullish
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches5≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break57.7512 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches5≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break57.7512 to 720
    Realized vol percentile feature.realized_vol_pctrank0.938≥ 0.93
    Return · 15m feature.ret_15m0.01296≥ 0.012
    Toxic flow (VPIN) feature.vpin0.5281≥ 0.52
    VPIN regime feature.vpin_regimeelevatedelevated
  5. 1 minute before · 6 Sep 00:59 UTC · 11 of 63 stood out

    Order book tilt -0.95 or lowerOrder book lopsidedness 0.059 or lower4-hour range against usual 2.5 or higherEngulfing (15m) is bullishHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursVolatility rank 0.9 or higherToxic flow (VPIN) 0.5 or higherVPIN regime is elevated
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance-0.9537≤ -0.95
    Book imbalance percentile feature.book_imbalance_pctrank0.05899≤ 0.059
    the last four-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_4h2.511≥ 2.5
    Engulfing · 15m feature.candle_engulfing_15mbullishbullish
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches5≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break57.9812 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches5≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break57.9812 to 720
    Realized vol percentile feature.realized_vol_pctrank0.9033≥ 0.9
    Toxic flow (VPIN) feature.vpin0.5064≥ 0.5
    VPIN regime feature.vpin_regimeelevatedelevated

Two other reading times we tried 6 and 6 matches

1 minute before (00:59): order book tilt -0.95 or lower, order book lopsidedness 0.059 or lower, volatility rank 0.9 or higher.

Book imbalance · top levels ≤ -0.95 and Book imbalance percentile ≤ 0.059 and Realized vol percentile ≥ 0.9

6 matches: price was 2% or more higher after 30 minutes in 0 of 6, and 2% or more lower in 1 of 6.

Of the 6 matches, 2 came before the rise began, 0 during it and 4 after it.

1 hour before (00:00): order book lopsidedness 0.066 or lower, 4-hour range against usual 2.5 or higher, volatility rank 0.99 or higher.

Book imbalance percentile ≤ 0.066 and the last four-hour candle range versus its baseline ≥ 2.5 and Realized vol percentile ≥ 0.99

6 matches: price was 2% or more higher after 30 minutes in 1 of 6, and 2% or more lower in 0 of 6.

Of the 6 matches, 3 came before the rise began, 3 during it and 0 after it.

Fewer than 30 results, so no rate is printed.

No set had 30 matches before the rise; the saved study leads with the one that had the most.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 7 matches came on 4 of 30 days, 3 during the rise.

Hourly candles around the risefull context, lead-up, move

The 01:00 start was picked after the move, and the hour before was already rising.

Price history: lead-up and selected move
selected startreadings taken here+57%0.864901.13311.4846Sep 5 23:00Sep 6 01:00Sep 6 21:00UTC · log price scale

Hourly candles, UTC. The marked lines are the minutes the readings came from: 1 minute, 15 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours and 24 hours before the selected start.

Other ways to test itsame dates

Each opens Review the test.

Running needs a free account and uses your allowance; you see the cost first.

Starting defaults and coverage

Starting defaults: 2026-08-14 to 2026-09-13 UTC; finishes up 2% or more after 1 hour. Review or change the markets, dates, conditions and outcome before running. Current recorded classification and sector tags, not point-in-time membership. Historical membership may differ. Instrument history does not guarantee every setup input or outcome is present; actual study exclusions remain authoritative.