SAGSAGAUSDTBinance USDT-M
Saved 1 Oct 2026 · will not change

SAGAUSDT rose 115% on 24 September 2026

What happenedUp 115% from the 21:00 UTC open to the 00:00 high on 25 September.Chart
Before itAt 20:59, 12 of 88 readings stood out; 3 were tested together.Setup
The recordToo few results to compare.Result

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Next step

What happened

Readings0.09660.025524 Sep06:0012:0018:0025 SepHighest trade 0.09167 in the 00:00 UTC hour on 25 September

Price opened the 21:00 hour at 0.04256 and reached a highest trade of 0.09167 in the 00:00 hour; the tested readings were taken at 20:59.

What stood out at 20:59

20:59 always meets its own rules.

What the record says

1 Sep to 30 Sep 2026

Too few results to compare

Price at least 2% higher after 30 minutes

This setup
6/28 measured outcomes · fewer than 30, so no rate is printed
Any SAGA minute, same dates
3,500/43,066 (8.1%)
0%10%

28 matches in 43,201 minutes checked.

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Evidence
At least 2% lower after 30 minutes
2% or more lower: 2 of 28; the other 20 closed less than 2% either way.
Direction only, any size, after 30 minutes
17 at or above the match price, 11 below; most of both were under 2% (20 of 28).
Reference
Every SAGA minute from 1 September to 30 September 2026 with a 30-minute close, the 28 matches included; not a matched control group. 135 minutes at the end of the dates had no 30-minute close yet and are left out, not counted as zero.
Did not reach the outcome
22 of 28 were not 2% or more higher.
Not a trading test
Entry, exit, fees, slippage and risk are not tested.

Does it hold on other markets?

Test it on the 608 eligible crypto markets

No result for these markets has been measured; nothing runs until you press Run.

Details
Exactly what was counted3 conditions · 28 of 43,201 minutes · saved text
  • Order book tilt 0.74 or higher. Size at the best bid against the best ask; above 0 means more bids, below 0 more asks.Book imbalance · top levels ≥ 0.74 · feature.book_imbalance
  • Order book lopsidedness 0.081 or lower. How lopsided the sizes at the best bid and ask were, either way, against recent readings; low means unusually even.Book imbalance percentile ≤ 0.081 · feature.book_imbalance_pctrank
  • 1-hour range against usual 0.47 or lower. The last finished 1-hour candle's high to low range, as a multiple of its usual range.Compression · 1h ≤ 0.47 · feature.candle_compression_1h

Read at 1 minute before the move.

Read at 20:59 UTC on 24 September, one minute before the selected 21:00 start.

SAGA only, 1 September to 30 September 2026 (UTC, ending 1 October 00:00); all 3 readings had values on 43,201 of those minutes.

Reference: every SAGA minute over the same dates, matches included; it is not a matched control group.

Outcome: the close exactly 30 minutes later, not the highest or lowest price along the way.

The 21:00 start was picked automatically after the move.

SAGAUSDT stored readings end 2026-10-01 00:00 UTC (exclusive). Prices and tick replay have separate coverage.

The feature manifest spans the lead-up. Individual minutes or inputs can still be unavailable.

This is not a similarity search. Each count matches the exact readings above and nothing else.

Picked in hindsight: the counts include every other time these readings appeared, not just this move.

Fires often arrive as clusters of consecutive minutes, and forward windows overlap. A cluster is one episode, not many independent trials.

If these counts read weaker than the move suggested, that is the tool working: the lead-up of a picked move always looks special until it is counted everywhere else.

Saved study q#0937204c @ dataset c764b05a, counted 1 Oct 2026 09:40 UTC.

Saved summary text, as written 1 Oct 2026

Written automatically when this study was saved and kept as written; where a line differs from the counts above, the counts govern.

Minutes like this appeared only 28 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often higher: 17 of the 28 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (61%).
17 rose and 11 fell over 28 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.9 a day, on 13 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

It counts the single minute on 1 October as a day.

The other reading times, as written

From 15 minutes before

Minutes like this appeared only 7 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often lower: 5 of the 7 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward fell (71%).
2 rose and 5 fell over 7 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.2 a day over 31 days, but 2026-09-26 alone holds 86% of them: this is close to a single episode.

From 1 hour before

Minutes like this appeared only 2 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often lower: 2 of the 2 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward fell (100%).
0 rose and 2 fell over 2 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.1 a day over 31 days, but 2026-09-24 alone holds 50% of them: this is close to a single episode.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 28 matches came on 13 of 30 days.

When the matches happened13 of 30 days
  • 11 Sep2 matches
  • 13 Sep3 matches
  • 18 Sep1 match
  • 19 Sep3 matches
  • 20 Sep1 match
  • 21 Sep2 matches
  • 22 Sep1 match
  • 24 Sep3 matches
  • 25 Sep6 matches
  • 26 Sep3 matches
  • 27 Sep1 match
  • 29 Sep1 match
  • 30 Sep1 match

No matches on the other 17 days.

Of the 28 matches, 16 came before the rise began, 0 during it and 12 after it.

Neighbouring minutes overlap, so these are not 28 separate trials.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 28 matches came on 13 of 30 days.

Other time frames30 minutes to 7 days

The answer uses 30 minutes, the time frame this study counted by default. Each row counts the same matches at a later close, in both directions. The bars show how often price was 2% or more higher at each time frame: first the matches, then any SAGA minute.

  1. 30 minutes
    Matches6 of 28 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any SAGA minute
    3,500 of 43,066 (8.1%)

    2 of 28 were 2% or more lower; any SAGA minute 3,240 of 43,066 (7.5%).

    Every match has a 30-minute close.

  2. 1 hour
    Matches7 of 28 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any SAGA minute
    5,222 of 43,036 (12.1%)

    4 of 28 were 2% or more lower; any SAGA minute 4,874 of 43,036 (11.3%).

    Every match has a 1-hour close.

  3. 4 hours
    Matches8 of 27 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any SAGA minute
    9,885 of 42,857 (23.1%)

    6 of 27 were 2% or more lower; any SAGA minute 9,437 of 42,857 (22.0%).

    1 without a 4-hour close yet, left out.

  4. 24 hours
    Matches8 of 27 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any SAGA minute
    17,659 of 41,661 (42.4%)

    12 of 27 were 2% or more lower; any SAGA minute 12,575 of 41,661 (30.2%).

    1 without a 24-hour close yet, left out.

  5. 72 hours
    Matches13 of 26 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any SAGA minute
    24,317 of 38,793 (62.7%)

    12 of 26 were 2% or more lower; any SAGA minute 11,254 of 38,793 (29.0%).

    2 without a 72-hour close yet, left out.

    At least 1 of these windows overlap the rise.

  6. 7 days
    Matches10 of 13 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any SAGA minute
    24,789 of 33,064 (75.0%)

    3 of 13 were 2% or more lower; any SAGA minute 5,790 of 33,064 (17.5%).

    15 without a 7-day close yet, left out.

    At least 8 of these windows overlap the rise.

0%100%

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 28 matches came on 13 of 30 days.

Readings at five times before the rise24 hours to 1 minute before · 2 other times tried

Highlights follow fixed rules, not significance tests. Proposed conditions round values or use ranges; inspect them before running.

  1. 24 hours before · 23 Sep 21:00 UTC · 10 of 88 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.58 or higher15-minute range against usual 0.47 or lowerContainment (15m) is insideUpper wick (15m) 0.64 or higherLiquidation bunching 0.65 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursDistance from the day's average price 0.026 or higher
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.5836≥ 0.58
    Compression · 15m feature.candle_compression_15m0.4674≤ 0.47
    Containment · 15m feature.candle_containment_15minsideinside
    Upper wick · 15m feature.candle_upper_wick_15m0.6406≥ 0.64
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.6595≥ 0.65
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break39012 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break20312 to 720
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist0.02667≥ 0.026
  2. 4 hours before · 24 Sep 17:00 UTC · 9 of 88 stood out

    Order book tilt -0.57 or lower15-minute range against usual 0.45 or lower1-hour range against usual 0.45 or lowerLiquidation bunching 0.64 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursDistance from the day's average price -0.064 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance-0.5746≤ -0.57
    Compression · 15m feature.candle_compression_15m0.4475≤ 0.45
    Compression · 1h feature.candle_compression_1h0.4418≤ 0.45
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.6433≥ 0.64
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break41012 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break22312 to 720
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.06403≤ -0.064
  3. 1 hour before · 24 Sep 20:00 UTC · 8 of 88 stood out

    1-hour range against usual 0.47 or lower4-hour range against usual 0.24 or lowerLiquidation bunching 0.64 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursDistance from the day's average price -0.059 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Compression · 1h feature.candle_compression_1h0.4653≤ 0.47
    Compression · 4h feature.candle_compression_4h0.2311≤ 0.24
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.6433≥ 0.64
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break41312 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break22612 to 720
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.05927≤ -0.059
  4. 15 minutes before · 24 Sep 20:45 UTC · 11 of 88 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.7 or higher1-hour range against usual 0.47 or lower4-hour range against usual 0.24 or lowerContainment (15m) is outsideSweep + reclaim (15m) is bullishLiquidation bunching 0.64 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursDistance from the day's average price -0.056 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.7023≥ 0.7
    Compression · 1h feature.candle_compression_1h0.4653≤ 0.47
    Compression · 4h feature.candle_compression_4h0.2311≤ 0.24
    Containment · 15m feature.candle_containment_15moutsideoutside
    Sweep + reclaim · 15m feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_15mbullishbullish
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.6433≥ 0.64
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break413.812 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break226.812 to 720
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.05687≤ -0.056
  5. 1 minute before · 24 Sep 20:59 UTC · 12 of 88 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.74 or higherOrder book lopsidedness 0.081 or lower1-hour range against usual 0.47 or lower4-hour range against usual 0.24 or lowerContainment (15m) is outsideSweep + reclaim (15m) is bullishLiquidation bunching 0.64 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursDistance from the day's average price -0.061 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.7458≥ 0.74
    Book imbalance percentile feature.book_imbalance_pctrank0.08066≤ 0.081
    Compression · 1h feature.candle_compression_1h0.4653≤ 0.47
    Compression · 4h feature.candle_compression_4h0.2311≤ 0.24
    Containment · 15m feature.candle_containment_15moutsideoutside
    Sweep + reclaim · 15m feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_15mbullishbullish
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.6433≥ 0.64
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break41412 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break22712 to 720
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.06126≤ -0.061

Two other reading times we tried 7 and 2 matches

15 minutes before (20:45): order book tilt 0.7 or higher, 1-hour range against usual 0.47 or lower, 4-hour range against usual 0.24 or lower.

Book imbalance · top levels ≥ 0.7 and Compression · 1h ≤ 0.47 and Compression · 4h ≤ 0.24

7 matches: price was 2% or more higher after 30 minutes in 0 of 7, and 2% or more lower in 0 of 7.

Of the 7 matches, 1 came before the rise began, 0 during it and 6 after it.

1 hour before (20:00): 1-hour range against usual 0.47 or lower, 4-hour range against usual 0.24 or lower, liquidation bunching 0.64 or higher.

Compression · 1h ≤ 0.47 and Compression · 4h ≤ 0.24 and Cascade clustering ≥ 0.64

2 matches: price was 2% or more higher after 30 minutes in 0 of 2, and 2% or more lower in 0 of 2.

Of the 2 matches, 1 came before the rise began, 0 during it and 1 after it.

Fewer than 30 results, so no rate is printed.

No set had 30 matches before the rise; the saved study leads with the one that had the most.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 28 matches came on 13 of 30 days.

Hourly candles around the risefull context, lead-up, move

The 21:00 start was picked after the move.

Price history: lead-up and selected move
selected startreadings taken here+115%0.025440.050070.09857Sep 23 23:00Sep 24 21:00Sep 25 04:00UTC · log price scale

Hourly candles, UTC. The marked lines are the minutes the readings came from: 1 minute, 15 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours and 24 hours before the selected start.

Other ways to test itsame dates

Each opens Review the test.

Running needs a free account and uses your allowance; you see the cost first.

Starting defaults and coverage

Starting defaults: 2026-09-01 to 2026-10-01 UTC; finishes up 2% or more after 1 hour. Review or change the markets, dates, conditions and outcome before running. Current recorded classification and sector tags, not point-in-time membership. Historical membership may differ. Instrument history does not guarantee every setup input or outcome is present; actual study exclusions remain authoritative.