Research is a work in progress. Estimated release: 1 December 2026. Our goal is to make it a search engine for trading setups in recorded crypto markets.

AXTAXTIUSDTBinance USDT-M
Saved 5 Aug 2026 · will not change

AXTIUSDT rose 85% on 30 July 2026

What happenedUp 85% from the 08:00 UTC open to the 13:00 high on 31 July.Chart
Before itAt 07:45, 4 of 39 readings stood out; 3 were tested together.Setup
The recordThe same readings held on 62 minutes; only the saved summary text describes what followed.Result

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Next step

What happened

Readings71.87734.36312:0030 Jul12:0031 Jul12:00Highest trade 69.29 in the 13:00 UTC hour on 31 July

Price opened the 08:00 hour at 37.46 and reached a highest trade of 69.29 in the 13:00 hour; the tested readings were taken at 07:45.

What stood out at 07:45

07:45 always meets its own rules.

What the record says

5 Jul to 3 Aug 2026

No counts were saved to compare, only the summary text

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Evidence
Not a trading test
Entry, exit, fees, slippage and risk are not tested.

Does it hold on other dates?

Test it on the 30 days before

Nothing runs until you press Run.

Details
Exactly what was counted3 conditions · 62 of 43,201 minutes · saved text

Saved summary text, as written 5 Aug 2026

Written automatically when this study was saved and kept as written; where a line differs from the counts above, the counts govern.

Minutes like this appeared 62 times in the 43,201 minutes searched (0.1%). What followed was close to a coin flip: 25 rose and 21 fell over the next 30 minutes (46 of the 62 matches have a complete 30 minutes forward).
About 2 a day, on 21 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

The other reading times, as written

From 1 minute before

Minutes like this appeared only 10 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed leaned up: 5 of the 7 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (71%).
About 0.3 a day, on 9 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

From 1 hour before

Minutes like this are common here: 457 of the 43,201 minutes searched (1.1%), about 15 a day. What followed was close to a coin flip: 190 rose and 196 fell over the next 30 minutes (386 of the 457 matches have a complete 30 minutes forward).
About 15 a day, on 22 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

Picked after the rise, on one market.

  • Order book tilt 0.57 or higher. Size at the best bid against the best ask; above 0 means more bids, below 0 more asks.Book imbalance · top levels ≥ 0.57 · feature.book_imbalance
  • Lower wick (15m) 0.72 or higher.Lower wick · 15m ≥ 0.72 · feature.candle_lower_wick_15m
  • Liquidation bunching 0.71 or higher. How bunched in time recent liquidations were; higher means more bunched, and it stays below 1.Cascade clustering ≥ 0.71 · feature.cascade_clustering_index

Read at 15 minutes before the move.

Read at 07:45 UTC on 30 July, 15 minutes before the selected 08:00 start.

AXTI only, 5 July to 3 August 2026 (UTC, ending 4 August 00:00); all 3 readings had values on 43,201 of those minutes.

Reference: every AXTI minute over the same dates, matches included; it is not a matched control group.

Outcome: the close exactly 30 minutes later, not the highest or lowest price along the way.

The 08:00 start was picked automatically after the move.

AXTIUSDT stored readings end 2026-08-04 00:00 UTC (exclusive). Prices and tick replay have separate coverage.

The feature manifest spans the lead-up. Individual minutes or inputs can still be unavailable.

This is not a similarity search. Each count matches the exact readings above and nothing else.

Picked in hindsight: the counts include every other time these readings appeared, not just this move.

Fires often arrive as clusters of consecutive minutes, and forward windows overlap. A cluster is one episode, not many independent trials.

If these counts read weaker than the move suggested, that is the tool working: the lead-up of a picked move always looks special until it is counted everywhere else.

Saved study q#7e570b00 @ dataset 461da594, counted 5 Aug 2026 02:50 UTC.

When the matches happened

Of the 62 matches, 51 came before the rise began, 2 during it and 9 after it.

Neighbouring minutes overlap, so these are not 62 separate trials.

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Readings at five times before the rise24 hours to 1 minute before · 2 other times tried

Highlights follow fixed rules, not significance tests. Proposed conditions round values or use ranges; inspect them before running.

  1. 24 hours before · 29 Jul 08:00 UTC · 2 of 39 stood out

    Liquidation bunching 0.71 or higherMinutes to funding 1 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.7154≥ 0.71
    Minutes to funding feature.mins_to_funding0≤ 1
  2. 4 hours before · 30 Jul 04:00 UTC · 3 of 39 stood out

    Order book lopsidedness 0.94 or higherContainment (15m) is insideLiquidation bunching 0.71 or higher
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance percentile feature.book_imbalance_pctrank0.944≥ 0.94
    Containment · 15m feature.candle_containment_15minsideinside
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.7115≥ 0.71
  3. 1 hour before · 30 Jul 07:00 UTC · 2 of 39 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.75 or higherLiquidation bunching 0.71 or higher
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.753≥ 0.75
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.7115≥ 0.71
  4. 15 minutes before · 30 Jul 07:45 UTC · 4 of 39 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.57 or higherLower wick (15m) 0.72 or higherLiquidation bunching 0.71 or higherMinutes to funding 15 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.5728≥ 0.57
    Lower wick · 15m feature.candle_lower_wick_15m0.7241≥ 0.72
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.7115≥ 0.71
    Minutes to funding feature.mins_to_funding15≤ 15
  5. 1 minute before · 30 Jul 07:59 UTC · 3 of 39 stood out

    Lower wick (15m) 0.72 or higherLiquidation bunching 0.71 or higherMinutes to funding 1 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Lower wick · 15m feature.candle_lower_wick_15m0.7241≥ 0.72
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.7115≥ 0.71
    Minutes to funding feature.mins_to_funding1≤ 1

Two other reading times we tried 10 and 457 matches

1 minute before (07:59): lower wick (15m) 0.72 or higher, liquidation bunching 0.71 or higher, minutes to funding 1 or lower.

Lower wick · 15m ≥ 0.72 and Cascade clustering ≥ 0.71 and Minutes to funding ≤ 1

10 matches.

Of the 10 matches, 9 came before the rise began, 0 during it and 1 after it.

1 hour before (07:00): order book tilt 0.75 or higher, liquidation bunching 0.71 or higher.

Book imbalance · top levels ≥ 0.75 and Cascade clustering ≥ 0.71

457 matches.

Of the first 400 of 457 matches checked, 303 came before the rise began, 21 during it and 76 after it.

Fewer than 30 results, so no rate is printed.

The saved study leads with 07:45: the narrowest set with at least 30 matches before the rise.

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Hourly candles around the risefull context, lead-up, move

The 08:00 start was picked after the move, and the hour before was already rising.

Price history: lead-up and selected move
selected startreadings taken here+85%34.847550.103772.0388Jul 29 06:00Jul 30 08:00Jul 31 17:00UTC · log price scale

Hourly candles, UTC. The marked lines are the minutes the readings came from: 1 minute, 15 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours and 24 hours before the selected start.

Other ways to test itsame dates

Same 3 conditions on AXTI, 5 June to 4 July 2026.

Each opens Review the test.

Running needs a free account and uses your allowance; you see the cost first.