Research Readings Liquidations
Liquidation bunching
Also shown as Cascade clustering
Summarizes uneven spacing between observed liquidation events. It is a smoothed timing estimator using up to 500 events, not a liquidation-volume total.
- Live monitoring
- Binance Futures only; depends on the full setup
- Observed
- read at the minute itself
- Unit
- Ratio
- Valid range
- 0 to 1
How to read it, with examples
How to read it
The estimator transforms the variation in positive inter-event gaps and blends it into a state initialized at 0.8. More variable gaps push the estimate higher; regular spacing pushes it lower. It becomes present after 10 events, so early readings can still be dominated by initialization. A value of 0.5 is an index level, not 50% of liquidations in a cascade. Values stay below 1 by construction and hold through quiet periods.
Study whether liquidation timing is more clustered alongside the current 15-second intensity. A held high index and zero current intensity describe different aspects of the same history.
What it does not prove
It is not evidence that one liquidation caused another. It cannot establish a self-sustaining cascade, current activity or a future cascade probability.
More limits
Publication throttling distorts the timing it observes.
What this cannot see
Binance throttles liquidation publications, so these readings describe the observed feed and miss some liquidation records.
Count estimation is still under validation. It would require uncertainty, support and freshness checks, and would not recover hidden event times or validate a price-level heatmap or cascade forecast.
Technical details
Registry definition
Concentration of liquidation prints into a local cascade.
Engine note
This moment-based estimator is not a fitted Hawkes model.
Field ID
feature.cascade_clustering_index
Valid query operators
at least, at most, between
Window operators: lowest, highest, average, latest or change in, over a trailing window.
Editable query preset
Starting point only. Review and edit before running.
{
"schema_version": "research_query.v2",
"normalization_version": "archive_normalization.v1",
"feature_version": "feature_defs.v1",
"target": "record_occurrences",
"where": {
"all": [
[
"feature.cascade_clustering_index",
"gte",
0.5
],
[
"times.anchor_time",
"gte",
"2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z"
]
]
},
"sort": [
"times.anchor_time",
"desc"
],
"page": {
"limit": 5,
"cursor": null
}
}The search reports how often the record held this condition and what followed. It does not decide whether an idea works.