Research is a work in progress. Estimated release: 1 December 2026. Our goal is to make it a search engine for trading setups in recorded crypto markets.

QQUSDTBinance USDT-M
Saved 30 Sep 2026 · will not change

QUSDT rose 218% on 26 September 2026

What happenedUp 218% from the 20:00 UTC open to the 14:00 high on 27 September.Chart
Before itAt 19:00, 8 of 88 readings stood out; 3 were tested together.Setup
The recordToo few results to compare.Result

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Next step

What happened

Readings0.06060.014918:0026 Sep06:0012:0018:0027 Sep06:0012:0018:00Highest trade 0.057408 in the 14:00 UTC hour on 27 September

Price opened the 20:00 hour at 0.01805 and reached a highest trade of 0.05741 in the 14:00 hour; the tested readings were taken at 19:00.

What stood out at 19:00

19:00 always meets its own rules.

What the record says

31 Aug to 29 Sep 2026

Too few results to compare

Price at least 2% higher after 30 minutes

This setup
1/18 measured outcomes · fewer than 30, so no rate is printed
Any Q minute, same dates
2,318/42,782 (5.4%)
0%10%

18 matches in 43,201 minutes checked.

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Evidence
At least 2% lower after 30 minutes
2% or more lower: 6 of 18; the other 11 closed less than 2% either way.
Direction only, any size, after 30 minutes
9 at or above the match price, 9 below; most of both were under 2% (11 of 18).
Reference
Every Q minute from 31 August to 29 September 2026 with a 30-minute close, the 18 matches included; not a matched control group. 419 minutes at the end of the dates had no 30-minute close yet and are left out, not counted as zero.
Did not reach the outcome
17 of 18 were not 2% or more higher.
Not a trading test
Entry, exit, fees, slippage and risk are not tested.

Does it hold on other markets?

Test it on the 608 eligible crypto markets

No result for these markets has been measured; nothing runs until you press Run.

Details
Exactly what was counted3 conditions · 18 of 43,201 minutes · saved text
  • Order book lopsidedness 0.047 or lower. How lopsided the sizes at the best bid and ask were, either way, against recent readings; low means unusually even.Book imbalance percentile ≤ 0.047 · feature.book_imbalance_pctrank
  • 4-hour range against usual 3.2 or higher. The last finished 4-hour candle's high to low range, as a multiple of its usual range.Compression · 4h ≥ 3.2 · feature.candle_compression_4h
  • Liquidation bunching 0.66 or higher. How bunched in time recent liquidations were; higher means more bunched, and it stays below 1.Cascade clustering ≥ 0.66 · feature.cascade_clustering_index

Read at 1 hour before the move.

Read at 19:00 UTC on 26 September, one hour before the selected 20:00 start.

Q only, 31 August to 29 September 2026 (UTC, ending 30 September 00:00); all 3 readings had values on 43,201 of those minutes.

Reference: every Q minute over the same dates, matches included; it is not a matched control group.

Outcome: the close exactly 30 minutes later, not the highest or lowest price along the way.

The 20:00 start was picked automatically after the move.

QUSDT stored readings end 2026-09-30 00:00 UTC (exclusive). Prices and tick replay have separate coverage.

The feature manifest spans the lead-up. Individual minutes or inputs can still be unavailable.

This is not a similarity search. Each count matches the exact readings above and nothing else.

Picked in hindsight: the counts include every other time these readings appeared, not just this move.

Fires often arrive as clusters of consecutive minutes, and forward windows overlap. A cluster is one episode, not many independent trials.

If these counts read weaker than the move suggested, that is the tool working: the lead-up of a picked move always looks special until it is counted everywhere else.

Saved study q#58aa6dfd @ dataset a0160256, counted 30 Sep 2026 21:17 UTC.

Saved summary text, as written 30 Sep 2026

Written automatically when this study was saved and kept as written; where a line differs from the counts above, the counts govern.

Minutes like this appeared only 18 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was close to a coin flip: 9 rose and 9 fell over the next 30 minutes (18 of the 18 matches have a complete 30 minutes forward).
9 rose and 9 fell over 18 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.6 a day over 31 days, but 2026-09-12 alone holds 44% of them: this is close to a single episode.

The other reading times, as written

From 1 minute before

Minutes like this appeared only 4 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often lower: 3 of the 4 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward fell (75%).
1 rose and 3 fell over 4 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.1 a day over 31 days, but 2026-09-26 alone holds 50% of them: this is close to a single episode.

From 4 hours before

Minutes like this appeared only 1 time in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often higher: 1 of the 1 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (100%).
1 rose and 0 fell over 1 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0 a day over 31 days, but 2026-09-26 alone holds 100% of them: this is close to a single episode.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 18 matches came on 4 of 30 days, 5 during the rise.

When the matches happened4 of 30 days
  • 31 Aug1 match
  • 12 Sep8 matches
  • 26 Sep7 matches
  • 27 Sep2 matches

No matches on the other 26 days.

Of the 18 matches, 13 came before the rise began, 5 during it and 0 after it.

Neighbouring minutes overlap, so these are not 18 separate trials.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 18 matches came on 4 of 30 days, 5 during the rise.

Other time frames30 minutes to 7 days

The answer uses 30 minutes, the time frame this study counted by default. Each row counts the same matches at a later close, in both directions. The bars show how often price was 2% or more higher at each time frame: first the matches, then any Q minute.

  1. 30 minutes
    Matches1 of 18 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any Q minute
    2,318 of 42,782 (5.4%)

    6 of 18 were 2% or more lower; any Q minute 1,909 of 42,782 (4.5%).

    Every match has a 30-minute close.

    At least 5 of these windows overlap the rise.

  2. 1 hour
    Matches4 of 18 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any Q minute
    3,499 of 42,750 (8.2%)

    6 of 18 were 2% or more lower; any Q minute 3,085 of 42,750 (7.2%).

    Every match has a 1-hour close.

    At least 5 of these windows overlap the rise.

  3. 4 hours
    Matches8 of 18 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any Q minute
    7,290 of 42,569 (17.1%)

    3 of 18 were 2% or more lower; any Q minute 6,941 of 42,569 (16.3%).

    Every match has a 4-hour close.

    At least 5 of these windows overlap the rise.

  4. 24 hours
    Matches4 of 18 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any Q minute
    13,548 of 41,372 (32.7%)

    8 of 18 were 2% or more lower; any Q minute 15,065 of 41,372 (36.4%).

    Every match has a 24-hour close.

    At least 5 of these windows overlap the rise.

  5. 72 hours
    Matches5 of 16 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any Q minute
    16,431 of 38,517 (42.7%)

    8 of 16 were 2% or more lower; any Q minute 14,093 of 38,517 (36.6%).

    2 without a 72-hour close yet, left out.

  6. 7 days
    Matches7 of 9 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any Q minute
    16,594 of 32,815 (50.6%)

    0 of 9 were 2% or more lower; any Q minute 12,794 of 32,815 (39.0%).

    9 without a 7-day close yet, left out.

0%100%

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 18 matches came on 4 of 30 days, 5 during the rise.

Readings at five times before the rise24 hours to 1 minute before · 2 other times tried

Highlights follow fixed rules, not significance tests. Proposed conditions round values or use ranges; inspect them before running.

  1. 24 hours before · 25 Sep 20:00 UTC · 10 of 88 stood out

    Order book lopsidedness 0.92 or higherEngulfing (1h) is bullishLiquidation bunching 0.59 or higherThe short descending resistance line is active 4hThe distance from price back to the broken short descending resistance between -0.5 and 0.5Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursThe support under the short descending resistance is risingTouches on the resistance 3 or moreDistance from the day's average price -0.032 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance percentile feature.book_imbalance_pctrank0.9254≥ 0.92
    Engulfing · 1h feature.candle_engulfing_1hbullishbullish
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.5939≥ 0.59
    the short descending resistance line feature.desc_resistance_short_activeactive_4hactive_4h
    the distance from price back to the broken short descending resistance feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_dist_atr-0.3097-0.5 to 0.5
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break8912 to 720
    the support under the short descending resistance feature.desc_resistance_short_supportrisingrising
    how many times price has touched the short descending resistance feature.desc_resistance_short_touches3≥ 3
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.03238≤ -0.032
  2. 4 hours before · 26 Sep 16:00 UTC · 8 of 88 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.99 or higher4-hour range against usual 3.2 or higherLiquidation bunching 0.76 or higherTouches on the broken resistance 3 or moreMinutes to funding 1 or lower15-minute price change 0.034 or higher1-hour price change 0.048 or higherDistance from the day's average price 0.19 or higher
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.9955≥ 0.99
    Compression · 4h feature.candle_compression_4h3.21≥ 3.2
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.76≥ 0.76
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    Minutes to funding feature.mins_to_funding0≤ 1
    Return · 15m feature.ret_15m0.03411≥ 0.034
    Return · 1h feature.ret_1h0.04828≥ 0.048
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist0.1931≥ 0.19
  3. 1 hour before · 26 Sep 19:00 UTC · 8 of 88 stood out

    Order book lopsidedness 0.047 or lower4-hour range against usual 3.2 or higherLiquidation bunching 0.66 or higherTouches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hours15-minute price change -0.13 or lower1-hour price change -0.14 or lowerDistance from the day's average price -0.38 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance percentile feature.book_imbalance_pctrank0.0467≤ 0.047
    Compression · 4h feature.candle_compression_4h3.21≥ 3.2
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.6612≥ 0.66
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break1212 to 720
    Return · 15m feature.ret_15m-0.1304≤ -0.13
    Return · 1h feature.ret_1h-0.1497≤ -0.14
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.3889≤ -0.38
  4. 15 minutes before · 26 Sep 19:45 UTC · 8 of 88 stood out

    15-minute range against usual 0.2 or lower4-hour range against usual 3.2 or higherContainment (15m) is insideLiquidation bunching 0.65 or higherTouches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hours1-hour price change -0.14 or lowerDistance from the day's average price -0.38 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Compression · 15m feature.candle_compression_15m0.1925≤ 0.2
    Compression · 4h feature.candle_compression_4h3.21≥ 3.2
    Containment · 15m feature.candle_containment_15minsideinside
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.654≥ 0.65
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break12.7512 to 720
    Return · 1h feature.ret_1h-0.1492≤ -0.14
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.3887≤ -0.38
  5. 1 minute before · 26 Sep 19:59 UTC · 8 of 88 stood out

    15-minute range against usual 0.2 or lower4-hour range against usual 3.2 or higherContainment (15m) is insideLiquidation bunching 0.64 or higherTouches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursVPIN regime is elevatedDistance from the day's average price -0.37 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Compression · 15m feature.candle_compression_15m0.1925≤ 0.2
    Compression · 4h feature.candle_compression_4h3.21≥ 3.2
    Containment · 15m feature.candle_containment_15minsideinside
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.6455≥ 0.64
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break12.9812 to 720
    VPIN regime feature.vpin_regimeelevatedelevated
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.3788≤ -0.37

Two other reading times we tried 4 and 1 matches

1 minute before (19:59): 15-minute range against usual 0.2 or lower, 4-hour range against usual 3.2 or higher, containment (15m) is inside.

Compression · 15m ≤ 0.2 and Compression · 4h ≥ 3.2 and Containment · 15m inside

4 matches: price was 2% or more higher after 30 minutes in 0 of 4, and 2% or more lower in 0 of 4.

Of the 4 matches, 4 came before the rise began, 0 during it and 0 after it.

4 hours before (16:00): order book tilt 0.99 or higher, 4-hour range against usual 3.2 or higher, liquidation bunching 0.76 or higher.

Book imbalance · top levels ≥ 0.99 and Compression · 4h ≥ 3.2 and Cascade clustering ≥ 0.76

1 match: price was 2% or more higher after 30 minutes in 0 of 1, and 2% or more lower in 0 of 1.

Of the 1 match, 1 came before the rise began, 0 during it and 0 after it.

Fewer than 30 results, so no rate is printed.

No set had 30 matches before the rise; the saved study leads with the one that had the most.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 18 matches came on 4 of 30 days, 5 during the rise.

Hourly candles around the risefull context, lead-up, move

The 20:00 start was picked after the move.

Price history: lead-up and selected move
selected startreadings taken here+218%0.015810.031250.06176Sep 25 18:00Sep 26 20:00Sep 27 18:00UTC · log price scale

Hourly candles, UTC. The marked lines are the minutes the readings came from: 1 minute, 15 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours and 24 hours before the selected start.

Other ways to test itsame dates

Each opens Review the test.

Running needs a free account and uses your allowance; you see the cost first.

Starting defaults and coverage

Starting defaults: 2026-08-31 to 2026-09-30 UTC; finishes up 2% or more after 1 hour. Review or change the markets, dates, conditions and outcome before running. Current recorded classification and sector tags, not point-in-time membership. Historical membership may differ. Instrument history does not guarantee every setup input or outcome is present; actual study exclusions remain authoritative.