Research is a work in progress. Estimated release: 1 December 2026. Our goal is to make it a search engine for trading setups in recorded crypto markets.

44USDTBinance USDT-M
Saved 12 Sep 2026 · will not change

4USDT rose 123% on 4 September 2026

What happenedUp 123% from the 16:00 UTC open to the 18:00 high on 5 September.Chart
Before itAt 15:00, 13 of 63 readings stood out; 3 were tested together.Setup
The recordToo few results to compare.Result

Picked after the rise, on one market.

What happened

Readings0.03740.013904 Sep06:0012:0018:0005 Sep06:0012:0018:00Highest trade 0.035758 in the 18:00 UTC hour on 5 September

Price opened the 16:00 hour at 0.01602 and reached a highest trade of 0.03576 in the 18:00 hour; the tested readings were taken at 15:00.

What stood out at 15:00

15:00 always meets its own rules.

What the record says

12 Aug to 10 Sep 2026

Too few results to compare

Price at least 2% higher after 30 minutes

This setup
5/12 measured outcomes · fewer than 30, so no rate is printed
Any 4 minute, same dates
3,889/43,149 (9.0%)
0%10%

12 matches in 43,201 minutes checked.

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Evidence
At least 2% lower after 30 minutes
2% or more lower: 0 of 12; the other 7 closed less than 2% either way.
Direction only, any size, after 30 minutes
8 at or above the match price, 4 below; most of both were under 2% (7 of 12).
Reference
Every 4 minute from 12 August to 10 September 2026 with a 30-minute close, the 12 matches included; not a matched control group. 52 minutes at the end of the dates had no 30-minute close yet and are left out, not counted as zero.
Did not reach the outcome
7 of 12 were not 2% or more higher.
Not a trading test
Entry, exit, fees, slippage and risk are not tested.

No test to open

Multiple recorded sectors: sector_alpha, sector_crypto. Choose one explicitly.

Details
Exactly what was counted3 conditions · 12 of 43,201 minutes · saved text
  • Order book tilt 0.66 or higher. Size at the best bid against the best ask; above 0 means more bids, below 0 more asks.Book imbalance · top levels ≥ 0.66 · feature.book_imbalance
  • 1-hour range against usual 2.8 or higher. The last finished 1-hour candle's high to low range, as a multiple of its usual range.the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline ≥ 2.8 · feature.candle_compression_1h
  • Volatility rank 0.99 or higher. How volatile the last hour was against this market's history, on a 0 to 1 scale.Realized vol percentile ≥ 0.99 · feature.realized_vol_pctrank

Read at 1 hour before the move.

Read at 15:00 UTC on 4 September, one hour before the selected 16:00 start.

4 only, 12 August to 10 September 2026 (UTC, ending 11 September 00:00); all 3 readings had values on 43,201 of those minutes.

Reference: every 4 minute over the same dates, matches included; it is not a matched control group.

Outcome: the close exactly 30 minutes later, not the highest or lowest price along the way.

The 16:00 start was picked automatically after the move.

4USDT stored readings end 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC (exclusive). Prices and tick replay have separate coverage.

The feature manifest spans the lead-up. Individual minutes or inputs can still be unavailable.

This is not a similarity search. Each count matches the exact readings above and nothing else.

Picked in hindsight: the counts include every other time these readings appeared, not just this move.

Fires often arrive as clusters of consecutive minutes, and forward windows overlap. A cluster is one episode, not many independent trials.

If these counts read weaker than the move suggested, that is the tool working: the lead-up of a picked move always looks special until it is counted everywhere else.

Saved study q#1e5d5eb2 @ dataset d31fb5af, counted 12 Sep 2026 08:01 UTC.

Saved summary text, as written 12 Sep 2026

Written automatically when this study was saved and kept as written; where a line differs from the counts above, the counts govern.

Minutes like this appeared only 12 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often higher: 8 of the 12 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (67%).
8 rose and 4 fell over 12 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.4 a day, on 9 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

It counts the single minute on 11 September as a day.

The other reading times, as written

From 1 minute before

Minutes like this appeared only 6 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was close to a coin flip: 3 rose and 3 fell over the next 30 minutes (6 of the 6 matches have a complete 30 minutes forward).
3 rose and 3 fell over 6 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.2 a day, on 6 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

From 15 minutes before

Minutes like this appeared only 6 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often higher: 4 of the 6 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (67%).
4 rose and 2 fell over 6 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.2 a day, on 6 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 12 matches came on 9 of 30 days, 1 during the rise.

When the matches happened9 of 30 days
  • 14 Aug1 match
  • 16 Aug1 match
  • 17 Aug1 match
  • 22 Aug2 matches
  • 26 Aug1 match
  • 28 Aug1 match
  • 29 Aug2 matches
  • 4 Sep2 matches
  • 9 Sep1 match

No matches on the other 21 days.

Of the 12 matches, 10 came before the rise began, 1 during it and 1 after it.

Neighbouring minutes overlap, so these are not 12 separate trials.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 12 matches came on 9 of 30 days, 1 during the rise.

Other time frames30 minutes to 7 days

The answer uses 30 minutes, the time frame this study counted by default. Each row counts the same matches at a later close, in both directions. The bars show how often price was 2% or more higher at each time frame: first the matches, then any 4 minute.

  1. 30 minutes
    Matches5 of 12 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any 4 minute
    3,889 of 43,149 (9.0%)

    0 of 12 were 2% or more lower; any 4 minute 3,403 of 43,149 (7.9%).

    Every match has a 30-minute close.

    At least 1 of these windows overlap the rise.

  2. 1 hour
    Matches4 of 12 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any 4 minute
    6,079 of 43,119 (14.1%)

    1 of 12 was 2% or more lower; any 4 minute 5,252 of 43,119 (12.2%).

    Every match has a 1-hour close.

    At least 1 of these windows overlap the rise.

  3. 4 hours
    Matches4 of 12 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any 4 minute
    12,574 of 42,939 (29.3%)

    5 of 12 were 2% or more lower; any 4 minute 11,357 of 42,939 (26.4%).

    Every match has a 4-hour close.

    At least 1 of these windows overlap the rise.

  4. 24 hours
    Matches7 of 12 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any 4 minute
    18,335 of 41,739 (43.9%)

    5 of 12 were 2% or more lower; any 4 minute 16,512 of 41,739 (39.6%).

    Every match has a 24-hour close.

    At least 1 of these windows overlap the rise.

  5. 72 hours
    Matches5 of 11 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any 4 minute
    22,284 of 38,860 (57.3%)

    4 of 11 were 2% or more lower; any 4 minute 12,326 of 38,860 (31.7%).

    1 without a 72-hour close yet, left out.

    At least 1 of these windows overlap the rise.

  6. 7 days
    Matches6 of 9 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any 4 minute
    25,966 of 33,107 (78.4%)

    2 of 9 were 2% or more lower; any 4 minute 3,226 of 33,107 (9.7%).

    3 without a 7-day close yet, left out.

    At least 2 of these windows overlap the rise.

0%100%

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 12 matches came on 9 of 30 days, 1 during the rise.

Readings at five times before the rise24 hours to 1 minute before · 2 other times tried

Highlights follow fixed rules, not significance tests. Proposed conditions round values or use ranges; inspect them before running.

  1. 24 hours before · 3 Sep 16:00 UTC · 8 of 63 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.84 or higherLiquidation bunching 0.56 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursMinutes to funding 1 or lowerDistance from the day's average price 0.028 or higher
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.8467≥ 0.84
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.5682≥ 0.56
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break16312 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break16312 to 720
    Minutes to funding feature.mins_to_funding0≤ 1
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist0.02873≥ 0.028
  2. 4 hours before · 4 Sep 12:00 UTC · 8 of 63 stood out

    Liquidation bunching 0.54 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hours15-minute price change -0.012 or lowerTaker buy share (15m) 0.25 or lowerDistance from the day's average price -0.042 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.5461≥ 0.54
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break18312 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break18312 to 720
    Return · 15m feature.ret_15m-0.0125≤ -0.012
    Taker buy share · 15m feature.taker_buy_ratio_15m0.2402≤ 0.25
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.04208≤ -0.042
  3. 1 hour before · 4 Sep 15:00 UTC · 13 of 63 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.66 or higher1-hour range against usual 2.8 or higherEngulfing (15m) is bullishSweep + reclaim (1h) is bullishLiquidation bunching 0.54 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursVolatility rank 0.99 or higher15-minute price change 0.015 or higher1-hour price change -0.029 or lowerDistance from the day's average price -0.025 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.6686≥ 0.66
    the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_1h2.851≥ 2.8
    Engulfing · 15m feature.candle_engulfing_15mbullishbullish
    Sweep + reclaim · 1h feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_1hbullishbullish
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.5409≥ 0.54
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break18612 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break18612 to 720
    Realized vol percentile feature.realized_vol_pctrank0.997≥ 0.99
    Return · 15m feature.ret_15m0.01578≥ 0.015
    Return · 1h feature.ret_1h-0.02923≤ -0.029
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.02587≤ -0.025
  4. 15 minutes before · 4 Sep 15:45 UTC · 13 of 63 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.64 or higher15-minute range against usual 0.5 or lower1-hour range against usual 2.8 or higherContainment (15m) is insideSweep + reclaim (1h) is bullishLiquidation bunching 0.54 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursMinutes to funding 15 or lower15-minute price change -0.015 or lower1-hour price change 0.025 or higher
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.6469≥ 0.64
    Compression · 15m feature.candle_compression_15m0.4975≤ 0.5
    the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_1h2.851≥ 2.8
    Containment · 15m feature.candle_containment_15minsideinside
    Sweep + reclaim · 1h feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_1hbullishbullish
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.5408≥ 0.54
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break186.812 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break186.812 to 720
    Minutes to funding feature.mins_to_funding15≤ 15
    Return · 15m feature.ret_15m-0.01503≤ -0.015
    Return · 1h feature.ret_1h0.02582≥ 0.025
  5. 1 minute before · 4 Sep 15:59 UTC · 13 of 63 stood out

    Order book lopsidedness 0.08 or lower15-minute range against usual 0.5 or lower1-hour range against usual 2.8 or higherContainment (15m) is insideSweep + reclaim (1h) is bullishLiquidation bunching 0.54 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursMinutes to funding 1 or lower15-minute price change 0.018 or higher1-hour price change 0.033 or higher
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance percentile feature.book_imbalance_pctrank0.07906≤ 0.08
    Compression · 15m feature.candle_compression_15m0.4975≤ 0.5
    the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_1h2.851≥ 2.8
    Containment · 15m feature.candle_containment_15minsideinside
    Sweep + reclaim · 1h feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_1hbullishbullish
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.5408≥ 0.54
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break18712 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break18712 to 720
    Minutes to funding feature.mins_to_funding1≤ 1
    Return · 15m feature.ret_15m0.01888≥ 0.018
    Return · 1h feature.ret_1h0.03328≥ 0.033

Two other reading times we tried 6 and 6 matches

1 minute before (15:59): order book lopsidedness 0.08 or lower, 15-minute range against usual 0.5 or lower, 1-hour range against usual 2.8 or higher.

Book imbalance percentile ≤ 0.08 and Compression · 15m ≤ 0.5 and the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline ≥ 2.8

6 matches: price was 2% or more higher after 30 minutes in 2 of 6, and 2% or more lower in 0 of 6.

Of the 6 matches, 5 came before the rise began, 0 during it and 1 after it.

15 minutes before (15:45): order book tilt 0.64 or higher, 15-minute range against usual 0.5 or lower, 1-hour range against usual 2.8 or higher.

Book imbalance · top levels ≥ 0.64 and Compression · 15m ≤ 0.5 and the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline ≥ 2.8

6 matches: price was 2% or more higher after 30 minutes in 1 of 6, and 2% or more lower in 0 of 6.

Of the 6 matches, 5 came before the rise began, 0 during it and 1 after it.

Fewer than 30 results, so no rate is printed.

No set had 30 matches before the rise; the saved study leads with the one that had the most.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 12 matches came on 9 of 30 days, 1 during the rise.

Hourly candles around the risefull context, lead-up, move

The 16:00 start was picked after the move, and the hour before was already rising.

Price history: lead-up and selected move
selected startreadings taken here+123%0.014200.023130.03768Sep 3 23:00Sep 4 16:00Sep 5 22:00UTC · log price scale

Hourly candles, UTC. The marked lines are the minutes the readings came from: 1 minute, 15 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours and 24 hours before the selected start.

Other ways to test itsame dates

Multiple recorded sectors: sector_alpha, sector_crypto. Choose one explicitly.

Each opens Review the test; nothing runs until you press Run.

Running needs a free account and uses your allowance; you see the cost first.

Starting defaults and coverage

Starting defaults: 2026-08-12 to 2026-09-11 UTC; finishes up 2% or more after 1 hour. Review or change the markets, dates, conditions and outcome before running. Current recorded classification and sector tags, not point-in-time membership. Historical membership may differ. Instrument history does not guarantee every setup input or outcome is present; actual study exclusions remain authoritative.