Research is a work in progress. Estimated release: 1 December 2026. Our goal is to make it a search engine for trading setups in recorded crypto markets.

44USDTBinance USDT-M
Saved 7 Sep 2026 · will not change

4USDT rose 158% on 2 September 2026

What happenedUp 158% from the 14:00 UTC open to the 18:00 high on 5 September.Chart
Before itAt 13:00, 9 of 58 readings stood out; 3 were tested together.Setup
The recordToo few results to compare.Result

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Next step

What happened

Readings0.03760.011502 Sep03 Sep04 Sep05 SepHighest trade 0.035758 in the 18:00 UTC hour on 5 September

Price opened the 14:00 hour at 0.01389 and reached a highest trade of 0.03576 in the 18:00 hour; the tested readings were taken at 13:00.

What stood out at 13:00

13:00 always meets its own rules.

What the record says

8 Aug to 6 Sep 2026

Too few results to compare

Price at least 2% higher after 30 minutes

This setup
1/18 measured outcomes · fewer than 30, so no rate is printed
Any 4 minute, same dates
4,017/43,149 (9.3%)
0%10%

18 matches in 43,201 minutes checked.

Picked after the rise, on one market.

Evidence
At least 2% lower after 30 minutes
2% or more lower: 1 of 18; the other 16 closed less than 2% either way.
Direction only, any size, after 30 minutes
14 at or above the match price, 4 below; most of both were under 2% (16 of 18).
Reference
Every 4 minute from 8 August to 6 September 2026 with a 30-minute close, the 18 matches included; not a matched control group. 52 minutes at the end of the dates had no 30-minute close yet and are left out, not counted as zero.
Did not reach the outcome
17 of 18 were not 2% or more higher.
Not a trading test
Entry, exit, fees, slippage and risk are not tested.

Does it hold on more dates?

Test it on the 30 days before

Nothing runs until you press Run.

Details
Exactly what was counted3 conditions · 18 of 43,201 minutes · saved text
  • Order book tilt 0.92 or higher. Size at the best bid against the best ask; above 0 means more bids, below 0 more asks.Book imbalance · top levels ≥ 0.92 · feature.book_imbalance
  • 1-hour range against usual 0.48 or lower. The last finished 1-hour candle's high to low range, as a multiple of its usual range.the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline ≤ 0.48 · feature.candle_compression_1h
  • Containment (15m) is outside.Containment · 15m outside · feature.candle_containment_15m

Read at 1 hour before the move.

Read at 13:00 UTC on 2 September, one hour before the selected 14:00 start.

4 only, 8 August to 6 September 2026 (UTC, ending 7 September 00:00); all 3 readings had values on 43,201 of those minutes.

Reference: every 4 minute over the same dates, matches included; it is not a matched control group.

Outcome: the close exactly 30 minutes later, not the highest or lowest price along the way.

The 14:00 start was picked automatically after the move.

4USDT stored readings end 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC (exclusive). Prices and tick replay have separate coverage.

The feature manifest spans the lead-up. Individual minutes or inputs can still be unavailable.

This is not a similarity search. Each count matches the exact readings above and nothing else.

Picked in hindsight: the counts include every other time these readings appeared, not just this move.

Fires often arrive as clusters of consecutive minutes, and forward windows overlap. A cluster is one episode, not many independent trials.

If these counts read weaker than the move suggested, that is the tool working: the lead-up of a picked move always looks special until it is counted everywhere else.

Saved study q#2edc08a8 @ dataset c5654b7b, counted 7 Sep 2026 08:34 UTC.

Saved summary text, as written 7 Sep 2026

Written automatically when this study was saved and kept as written; where a line differs from the counts above, the counts govern.

Minutes like this appeared only 18 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often higher: 14 of the 18 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (78%).
14 rose and 4 fell over 18 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.6 a day, on 14 of 31 days: spread through the record rather than one event.

It counts the single minute on 7 September as a day.

The other reading times, as written

From 1 minute before

Minutes like this appeared only 2 times in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often higher: 2 of the 2 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (100%).
2 rose and 0 fell over 2 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0.1 a day over 31 days, but 2026-08-30 alone holds 50% of them: this is close to a single episode.

From 4 hours before

Minutes like this appeared only 1 time in the 43,201 minutes searched. What followed was more often higher: 1 of the 1 matches with a complete 30 minutes forward rose (100%).
1 rose and 0 fell over 1 complete 30m windows. Too few completed windows for a directional generalization. No horizon cleared the floor of 30 complete windows on both the setup and the reference, so no lift is claimed.
About 0 a day over 31 days, but 2026-09-02 alone holds 100% of them: this is close to a single episode.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 18 matches came on 14 of 30 days.

When the matches happened14 of 30 days
  • 12 Aug1 match
  • 14 Aug1 match
  • 15 Aug1 match
  • 16 Aug1 match
  • 17 Aug1 match
  • 18 Aug1 match
  • 19 Aug1 match
  • 20 Aug2 matches
  • 22 Aug2 matches
  • 23 Aug2 matches
  • 28 Aug2 matches
  • 30 Aug1 match
  • 2 Sep1 match
  • 6 Sep1 match

No matches on the other 16 days.

Of the 18 matches, 17 came before the rise began, 0 during it and 1 after it.

Neighbouring minutes overlap, so these are not 18 separate trials.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 18 matches came on 14 of 30 days.

Other time frames30 minutes to 7 days

The answer uses 30 minutes, the time frame this study counted by default. Each row counts the same matches at a later close, in both directions. The bars show how often price was 2% or more higher at each time frame: first the matches, then any 4 minute.

  1. 30 minutes
    Matches1 of 18 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any 4 minute
    4,017 of 43,149 (9.3%)

    1 of 18 was 2% or more lower; any 4 minute 3,241 of 43,149 (7.5%).

    Every match has a 30-minute close.

  2. 1 hour
    Matches4 of 18 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any 4 minute
    6,285 of 43,119 (14.6%)

    1 of 18 was 2% or more lower; any 4 minute 4,980 of 43,119 (11.5%).

    Every match has a 1-hour close.

  3. 4 hours
    Matches10 of 18 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any 4 minute
    13,337 of 42,939 (31.1%)

    1 of 18 was 2% or more lower; any 4 minute 10,887 of 42,939 (25.4%).

    Every match has a 4-hour close.

  4. 24 hours
    Matches16 of 17 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any 4 minute
    19,494 of 41,739 (46.7%)

    1 of 17 was 2% or more lower; any 4 minute 14,988 of 41,739 (35.9%).

    1 without a 24-hour close yet, left out.

  5. 72 hours
    Matches11 of 17 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any 4 minute
    21,852 of 38,859 (56.2%)

    3 of 17 were 2% or more lower; any 4 minute 13,064 of 38,859 (33.6%).

    1 without a 72-hour close yet, left out.

  6. 7 days
    Matches13 of 16 · fewer than 30, no rate
    Any 4 minute
    20,318 of 33,100 (61.4%)

    0 of 16 were 2% or more lower; any 4 minute 8,507 of 33,100 (25.7%).

    2 without a 7-day close yet, left out.

    At least 3 of these windows overlap the rise.

0%100%

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 18 matches came on 14 of 30 days.

Readings at five times before the rise24 hours to 1 minute before · 2 other times tried

Highlights follow fixed rules, not significance tests. Proposed conditions round values or use ranges; inspect them before running.

  1. 24 hours before · 1 Sep 14:00 UTC · 9 of 58 stood out

    Order book tilt -0.93 or lower4-hour range against usual 0.31 or lowerSweep + reclaim (1h) is bearishLiquidation bunching 0.59 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursDistance from the day's average price 0.023 or higher
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance-0.9363≤ -0.93
    the last four-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_4h0.3044≤ 0.31
    Sweep + reclaim · 1h feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_1hbearishbearish
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.59≥ 0.59
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break11312 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break11312 to 720
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist0.0234≥ 0.023
  2. 4 hours before · 2 Sep 10:00 UTC · 12 of 58 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.86 or higherLower wick (15m) 0.92 or higherSweep + reclaim (15m) is bullishSweep + reclaim (1h) is bullishLiquidation bunching 0.58 or higherThe distance from price back to the broken descending resistance between -0.5 and 0.5How many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720The distance from price back to the broken short descending resistance between -0.5 and 0.5Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hoursDistance from the day's average price -0.02 or lower
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.8625≥ 0.86
    Lower wick · 15m feature.candle_lower_wick_15m0.9209≥ 0.92
    Sweep + reclaim · 15m feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_15mbullishbullish
    Sweep + reclaim · 1h feature.candle_sweep_reclaim_1hbullishbullish
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.5825≥ 0.58
    the distance from price back to the broken descending resistance feature.desc_resistance_broken_dist_atr-0.2334-0.5 to 0.5
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break13312 to 720
    the distance from price back to the broken short descending resistance feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_dist_atr-0.4073-0.5 to 0.5
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break13312 to 720
    VWAP distance · day feature.vwap_dist-0.02028≤ -0.02
  3. 1 hour before · 2 Sep 13:00 UTC · 9 of 58 stood out

    Order book tilt 0.92 or higher1-hour range against usual 0.48 or lowerContainment (15m) is outsideUpper wick (15m) 0.6 or higherLiquidation bunching 0.58 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hours
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    Book imbalance · top levels feature.book_imbalance0.9223≥ 0.92
    the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_1h0.4747≤ 0.48
    Containment · 15m feature.candle_containment_15moutsideoutside
    Upper wick · 15m feature.candle_upper_wick_15m0.6009≥ 0.6
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.5817≥ 0.58
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break13612 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break13612 to 720
  4. 15 minutes before · 2 Sep 13:45 UTC · 7 of 58 stood out

    1-hour range against usual 0.48 or lowerLower wick (15m) 0.79 or higherLiquidation bunching 0.58 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hours
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_1h0.4747≤ 0.48
    Lower wick · 15m feature.candle_lower_wick_15m0.7925≥ 0.79
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.5817≥ 0.58
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break136.812 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break136.812 to 720
  5. 1 minute before · 2 Sep 13:59 UTC · 7 of 58 stood out

    1-hour range against usual 0.48 or lowerLower wick (15m) 0.79 or higherLiquidation bunching 0.58 or higherHow many times the broken descending resistance had been tested 3 or higherHow long ago the descending resistance broke between 12 and 720Touches on the broken resistance 3 or moreTime since the resistance broke between 12 and 720 hours
    Show the full readings
    ReadingValue at that minuteStored rule
    the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline feature.candle_compression_1h0.4747≤ 0.48
    Lower wick · 15m feature.candle_lower_wick_15m0.7925≥ 0.79
    Cascade clustering feature.cascade_clustering_index0.5817≥ 0.58
    how many times the broken descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_broken_touches4≥ 3
    how long ago the descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_hours_since_break13712 to 720
    how many times the broken short descending resistance had been tested feature.desc_resistance_short_broken_touches3≥ 3
    how long ago the short descending resistance broke feature.desc_resistance_short_hours_since_break13712 to 720

Two other reading times we tried 2 and 1 matches

1 minute before (13:59): 1-hour range against usual 0.48 or lower, lower wick (15m) 0.79 or higher, liquidation bunching 0.58 or higher.

the last one-hour candle range versus its baseline ≤ 0.48 and Lower wick · 15m ≥ 0.79 and Cascade clustering ≥ 0.58

2 matches: price was 2% or more higher after 30 minutes in 1 of 2, and 2% or more lower in 0 of 2.

Of the 2 matches, 2 came before the rise began, 0 during it and 0 after it.

4 hours before (10:00): order book tilt 0.86 or higher, lower wick (15m) 0.92 or higher, sweep + reclaim (15m) is bullish.

Book imbalance · top levels ≥ 0.86 and Lower wick · 15m ≥ 0.92 and Sweep + reclaim · 15m bullish

1 match: price was 2% or more higher after 30 minutes in 1 of 1, and 2% or more lower in 0 of 1.

Of the 1 match, 1 came before the rise began, 0 during it and 0 after it.

Fewer than 30 results, so no rate is printed.

No set had 30 matches before the rise; the saved study leads with the one that had the most.

Picked after the rise, on one market; the 18 matches came on 14 of 30 days.

Hourly candles around the risefull context, lead-up, move

The 14:00 start was picked after the move, and the hour before was already rising.

Price history: lead-up and selected move
selected startreadings taken here+158%0.012160.021500.03801Sep 1 12:00Sep 2 14:00Sep 5 22:00UTC · log price scale

Hourly candles, UTC. The marked lines are the minutes the readings came from: 1 minute, 15 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours and 24 hours before the selected start.

Other ways to test itsame dates

Same 3 conditions on 4, 9 July to 7 August 2026.

Each opens Review the test.

Running needs a free account and uses your allowance; you see the cost first.